The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rethinking the Univariate Approach to Unit Root Testing: Using Covariates to Increase Power
Abstract
In the context of testing for a unit root in a univariate time series, the convention is to ignore information in related time series. This paper shows that this convention is quite costly, as large power gains can be achieved by including correlated stationary covariates in the regression equation. The paper derives the asymptotic distribution of ordinary least-squares estimates of the largest autoregressive root and its t-statistic. The asymptotic distribution is not the conventional Dickey-Fuller distribution, but a convex combination of the Dickey-Fuller distribution and the standard normal, the mixture depending on the correlation between the equation error and the regression covariates. The local asymptotic power functions associated with these test statistics suggest enormous gains over the conventional unit root tests. A simulation study and empirical application illustrate the potential of the new approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing
Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913236 · Cited by 32,007
Cited by
Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.616 · Cited by 20,385
A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence
Pesaran, M. H. (2007) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.951 · Cited by 12,787
Modelling Asymmetric Cointegration and Dynamic Multipliers in a Nonlinear ARDL Framework
Shin, Y., Yu, B., & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014) · Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-8008-3_9 · Cited by 3,835
A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross Section Dependence
Pesaran, M. H. (2003) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.457280 · Cited by 1,310
Distributions of error correction tests for cointegration
Ericsson, N. R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (2002) · The Econometrics Journal · doi:10.1111/1368-423x.00085 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Hansen, B. E.
- Venue
- Econometric Theory
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1148-1171
- ISSN
- 0266-4666 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-4360
- OpenAlex
- W2122542714
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rethinking the Univariate Approach to Unit Root Testing: Using Covariates to Increase Power. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0266466600009993
- The paper
- Hansen, B. E. (1995). Rethinking the Univariate Approach to Unit Root Testing: Using Covariates to Increase Power. Econometric Theory. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266466600009993
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.