The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ESTIMATION OF A THRESHOLD MODEL
Abstract
Threshold models (sample splitting models) have wide application in economics. Existing estimation methods are confined to regression models, which require that all right-hand-side variables are exogenous. This paper considers a model with endogenous variables but an exogenous threshold variable. We develop a two-stage least squares estimator of the threshold parameter and a generalized method of moments estimator of the slope parameters. We show that these estimators are consistent, and we derive the asymptotic distribution of the estimators. The threshold estimate has the same distribution as for the regression case (Hansen, 2000, Econometrica 68, 575–603), with a different scale. The slope parameter estimates are asymptotically normal with conventional covariance matrices. We investigate our distribution theory with a Monte Carlo simulation that indicates the applicability of the methods.We thank the two referees and co-editor for constructive comments. Hansen thanks the National Science Foundation for financial support. Caner thanks University of Pittsburgh Central Research Development Fund for financial support.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment
Fazzari, S. M., Hubbard, R. G., Petersen, B. C., Blinder, A. S., & Poterba, J. M. (1988) · Brookings Papers on Economic Activity · doi:10.2307/2534426 · Cited by 5,574
Cited by
Does too much finance harm economic growth?
Law, S. H., & Singh, N. (2014) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.12.020 · Cited by 789
Dynamic panels with threshold effect and endogeneity
Seo, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2016) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2016.03.005 · Cited by 698
Samargandi, N., Fidrmuc, J., & Ghosh, S. (2015) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.11.010 · Cited by 647
Nonlinearity in the financial development–income inequality nexus
Kim, D.-H., & Lin, S.-C. (2011) · Journal of Comparative Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jce.2011.07.002 · Cited by 209
Financial development and innovation-led growth: Is too much finance better?
Zhu, X., Asimakopoulos, S., & Kim, J. (2020) · Journal of International Money and Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2019.102083 · Cited by 173
Financial development, institutional investors, and economic growth
Ruiz, J. L. (2018) · International Review of Economics & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.iref.2017.08.009 · Cited by 164
Non‐linear finance–growth nexus: A threshold with instrumental variable approach1
Huang, H., & Lin, S. (2009) · Economics of Transition · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0351.2009.00360.x · Cited by 148
Wu, J.-Y., & Hsu, C.-C. (2012) · Economic Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2012.06.013 · Cited by 144
Institutions and the financial development–economic growth nexus in sub‐Saharan Africa
Aluko, O. A., & Ibrahim, M. (2020) · Economic Notes · doi:10.1111/ecno.12163 · Cited by 121
Institutions and the finance–growth nexus: Empirical evidence from MENA countries
Gazdar, K., & Cherif, M. (2015) · Borsa Istanbul Review · doi:10.1016/j.bir.2015.06.001 · Cited by 118
Ehigiamusoe, K. U., & Samsurijan, M. S. (2021) · International Journal of Finance & Economics · doi:10.1002/ijfe.2066 · Cited by 87
Asteriou, D., Spanos, K., & Trachanas, E. (2024) · International Journal of Finance & Economics · doi:10.1002/ijfe.2793 · Cited by 37
“…Singh (2014) 87 Panel data, 1980–2010 Kremer (2013) GMM bγ = 80% (PRIVY) bγ = 91% (LLY) bγ = 99% (PRIVY) Samargandi et al. (2015) 52 Panel data, 1980–2008 Caner and Hansen (2004) FD index Bank sector index bγ = 91.5% (FD) bγ = 91.8% (FD) bγ = 43.3% (FD) Note: PRIVY stands for credit to private…”
InfluentialFinancial sector development and growth volatility: An international study
Xue, W.-J. (2020) · International Review of Economics & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.iref.2020.06.025 · Cited by 31
Arogundade, S., Ngarachu, M., & Bandele, O. (2025) · Journal of Economic Structures · doi:10.1186/s40008-025-00360-7 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Caner, M., & Hansen, B. E.
- Venue
- Econometric Theory
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 05
- ISSN
- 0266-4666 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-4360
- OpenAlex
- W2127882594
- Cited by
- 777
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.