Cited by 789Monetary Policy and Economic ImpactEconomic Growth and ProductivityEconomic Theory and Policy

Does too much finance harm economic growth?

Open access
Law, Siong Hook, Singh, Nirvikar·2014·Journal of Banking & Finance

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.12.020

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior studies have found a significant negative short-run relationship between financial inclusion and economic growth.

    “This result is consistent with other scholars who found a significant negative relationship between these variables in the short run (Seven and Yetkiner 2016; Law and Singh 2014; Gour è ne and Mendy 2017; Collins and Ng'weno 2018; van Wyk and Kapingura 2021).”
  • Law and Singh (2014) and Gour è ne and Mendy (2017) argued that the short-run negative relationship may be due to high inequality in the regions, low domestic saving, and high dependency on foreign capital sources.

    “Law and Singh (2014) and Gour è ne and Mendy (2017) argued that one of the reasons for the short-run negative relationship may be due to the high inequality in the regions, the low level of domestic saving, and a high dependency on foreign capital sources.”
  • Finance promotes growth until a threshold of finance to GDP ratio reached about 88%, after which the impact of finance on growth turns negative.

    “Law and Singh (2014) identified that finance promotes growth until a threshold of finance to GDP ratio reached about 88%. Otherwise, the impact of finance on growth will turn negative as financial inclusion exceeds the threshold.”
  • The results differ from Law and Singh (2014), Arcand, Berkes, and Panizza (2015), and Ibrahim and Alagidede (2018).

    “Our results also differ from Law and Singh (2014), Arcand, Berkes, and Panizza (2015), and Ibrahim and Alagidede (2018).”
  • The quadratic specification strategy imposes that the effect of finance on growth monotonically and symmetrically increases and decreases with the level of financial development.

    “As Law and Singh (2014) argue, the quadratic specification strategy imposes that the effect of finance on growth monotonically and symmetrically increases and decreases with the level of financial development.”

    From Finance-growth nexus in sub-Saharan Africa (2021) · cites this paper as Law and Singh (2014)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Law, S. H., & Singh, N.
Affiliations
  • Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Corresponding author
Law, Siong Hook
Venue
Journal of Banking & Finance
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
41
Pages
36-44
ISSN
0378-4266 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090721537
Cited by
789
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 11 · 2012: 2
FWCI
131.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Banking & Finance (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economic Theory and Policy
Keywords
finance-growth relationship, financial development, economic growth, threshold effects, developed and developing countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review