Cited by 46Monetary Policy and Economic ImpactDiverse Scientific and Economic StudiesTime Series Analysis and Forecasting

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ESTIMATION AND INFERENCE WITH NEAR UNIT ROOTS

Open access
Phillips, Peter C.B.·2023·Econometric Theory

Abstract

New methods are developed for identifying, estimating, and performing inference with nonstationary time series that have autoregressive roots near unity. The approach subsumes unit-root (UR), local unit-root (LUR), mildly integrated (MI), and mildly explosive (ME) specifications in the new model formulation. It is shown how a new parameterization involving a localizing rate sequence that characterizes departures from unity can be consistently estimated in all cases. Simple pivotal limit distributions that enable valid inference about the form and degree of nonstationarity apply for MI and ME specifications and new limit theory holds in UR and LUR cases. Normalizing and variance stabilizing properties of the new parameterization are explored. Simulations are reported that reveal some of the advantages of this alternative formulation of nonstationary time series. A housing market application of the methods is conducted that distinguishes the differing forms of house price behavior in Australian state capital cities over the past decade.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0266466622000342

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GDP, FD, and INV are stationary at first difference, while OIL and INF are stationary at level.

    “The result of unit root shows that GDP, FD and INV are stationary at first difference, however, OIL and INF are stationary at level, so the result of the unit root test gives the level of confidence for the application of panel ARDL for estimation [51,52,53,54].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Phillips, P. C. B.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Phillips, Peter C.B.
Venue
Econometric Theory
Published
2022-07-27
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
221-263
ISSN
  • 0266-4666 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-4360
OpenAlex
W3210210310
Cited by
44
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3
FWCI
12.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Econometric Theory (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0956687, 1850860)
  • University of Auckland
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
Keywords
near unit root, non-stationary time series, asymptotic distribution, variance stabilization, housing prices, housing market

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review