The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Aptitude for learning a foreign language
Abstract
What has happened with the construct of foreign language aptitude since 1990, at which time symposium participants from around the world agreed that the "Time has come to rethink the notion of what constitutes aptitude to learn foreign languages?" To answer this question, we begin with a review of studies on foreign language aptitude and its measurement prior to 1990. We then describe research and thinking in the 1990s in several areas, including affective variables; language learning strategies; learning styles as contributors to aptitude; and aptitude as a cognitive construct affected by language variables. Next, we review research on individual differences in language learners and the importance of phonological/orthographic processing for foreign language learning. Finally, we suggest new directions for research in foreign language aptitude.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The basic premise of the LCDH model is that native language (L1) literacy skills are essential for predicting L2 learning.
“the basic premise of the LCDH model lies in the argument that native language (L1) literacy skills are essential for predicting L2 learning.”
From Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow (2017) · cites this paper as Sparks & Ganschow 2001
If a student experiences difficulties in L1 phonology/orthography, their subsequent L2 learning will likely suffer as well.
“if a student experiences difficulties in L1 phonology/orthography, his/her subsequent L2 learning will likely suffer as well (Sparks & Ganschow 2001: 97).”
From Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow (2017) · cites this paper as Sparks & Ganschow 2001
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow
Wen, Z. (., Biedroń, A., & Skehan, P. (2017) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444816000276 · Cited by 248
Metadata
- Authors
- Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Applied Linguistics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 21
- Pages
- 90-111
- ISSN
- 0267-1905
- 1471-6356
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review