Cited by 75

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Aptitude for learning a foreign language

Sparks, Richard, Ganschow, Leonore·2001·Annual Review of Applied Linguistics

Abstract

What has happened with the construct of foreign language aptitude since 1990, at which time symposium participants from around the world agreed that the "Time has come to rethink the notion of what constitutes aptitude to learn foreign languages?" To answer this question, we begin with a review of studies on foreign language aptitude and its measurement prior to 1990. We then describe research and thinking in the 1990s in several areas, including affective variables; language learning strategies; learning styles as contributors to aptitude; and aptitude as a cognitive construct affected by language variables. Next, we review research on individual differences in language learners and the importance of phonological/orthographic processing for foreign language learning. Finally, we suggest new directions for research in foreign language aptitude.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s026719050100006x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The basic premise of the LCDH model is that native language (L1) literacy skills are essential for predicting L2 learning.

    “the basic premise of the LCDH model lies in the argument that native language (L1) literacy skills are essential for predicting L2 learning.”

    From Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow (2017) · cites this paper as Sparks & Ganschow 2001

  • If a student experiences difficulties in L1 phonology/orthography, their subsequent L2 learning will likely suffer as well.

    “if a student experiences difficulties in L1 phonology/orthography, his/her subsequent L2 learning will likely suffer as well (Sparks & Ganschow 2001: 97).”

    From Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow (2017) · cites this paper as Sparks & Ganschow 2001

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L.
Venue
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics
Published
2001-01
Volume
21
Pages
90-111
ISSN
  • 0267-1905
  • 1471-6356
Cited by
75
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review