The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DEVELOPING ASSESSMENT LITERACY
Open accessAbstract
Language testing and assessment have moved center stage in recent years, whether for educational, employment, or sociopolitical reasons. More and more people are involved in developing tests and using test score outcomes, though often without a background or training in assessment to equip them adequately for this role. Simultaneously, increasing professionalization of the field has led to the generation of standards, ethical codes, and guidelines for good testing practice. Although these can help make assessment practices more transparent and accessible to a wider constituency, they also risk promoting a view of language testing as highly technical and specialized–best left to experts. These trends have implications for both policy and practice. This article reviews efforts to promote understanding of assessment within the field of applied linguistics and within education and society more broadly. The role of professional associations, academic institutions, and commercial organizations in developing assessment literacy is considered, as well as the contribution of published material and other types of training resources. This article reflects on how the international language testing community can encourage the sharing of the core knowledge, skills, and understanding that underpin good quality assessment as widely and accessibly for the benefit of all.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The standards for educational and psychological testing.
Eignor, D. R. (2013) · APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology, Vol. 1: Test theory and testing and assessment in industrial and organizational psychology. · doi:10.1037/14047-013 · Cited by 6,988
Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing
Spolsky, B., & Bachman, L. F. (1991) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/329499 · Cited by 4,362
Educational measurement, 3rd ed.
Linn, R. L. (1989) · Cited by 2,857
Kenyon, D. M., Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1998) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/328718 · Cited by 2,323
Read, J. (2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511732942 · Cited by 1,305
Measuring Second Language Performance
Kleinsasser, R. C., & McNamara, T. (1998) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/330236 · Cited by 1,253
Hughes, A., & Hughes, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009024723 · Cited by 1,009
Encyclopedia of Language and Education
(2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3 · Cited by 943
(2000) · Cited by 919
Fleming, C. M., & Travers, R. M. W. (1955) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3119507 · Cited by 910
Cited by
The Routledge Handbook of Language Testing
(2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203181287 · Cited by 345
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, L.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Applied Linguistics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 29
- Pages
- 21-36
- ISSN
- 0267-1905 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-6356
- OpenAlex
- W2017735442
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 22.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DEVELOPING ASSESSMENT LITERACY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0267190509090035
- The paper
- Taylor, L. (2009). DEVELOPING ASSESSMENT LITERACY. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190509090035
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.