Multilingualism and Technology: A Review of Developments in Digital Communication from Monolingualism to Idiolingualism
Abstract
The focus in this article is on the evolution of language and technology in relation to multilingualism, in particular on how multilingual provision has developed in tandem with the development of the internet and the World Wide Web (WWW). In trying to understand how multilingualism has evolved, it is also necessary to understand how the technical aspects of digital technology as well as the politico-economic dimensions to that technology have changed. Four distinct periods emerge in the development: monolingualism, multilingualism, hyperlingualism, and idiolingualism. Monolingualism covers the origins of the internet and later the WWW as monolingual spaces. This was followed by a long period that charts the slow but gradual development of increased language provision and what I am terming “partial multilingualism.” Multilingualism expanded substantially, potentially limitlessly, with the development of Web 2.0. This has involved the diversification of online spaces to the point of “hyperlingualism.” I argue that we are still in this hyperlingual phase, but alongside it, a new phase is developing, that of “idiolingualism” as a result of mass linguistic customization. In this article, I discuss these phases, paying attention to both their technical and economic contexts, as well as their implications for linguistic diversity online and in wider society.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 eras, Indigenous communities have gone beyond being recipients of information or collaborators to also being Internet 'Produsers' and creators.
“In the Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 eras, Indigenous communities have gone beyond being recipients of information or collaborators to also being Internet “Produsers” (Kelly-Holmes, 2019) and creators.”
From Decolonizing the digital landscape: the role of technology in Indigenous language revitalization (2021) · cites this paper as Kelly-Holmes, 2019
Tim Berners-Lee envisaged 'universality' and dictated the monolingual English design of the web.
“For example, Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the World Wide Web, envisaged “universality” and “dictated the monolingual [English] design of the web” (Kelly-Holmes, 2019, p. 28).”
From Decolonizing the digital landscape: the role of technology in Indigenous language revitalization (2021) · cites this paper as Kelly-Holmes, 2019
The role of technology in ILR has grown and evolved in a short space of time from being an extension of dominant Western hegemonies to one in which Indigenous Peoples have an active and important voice in how technology is used, envisioned and created.
“The role of technology in ILR has grown and evolved in a short space of time from being an extension of dominant Western hegemonies (Kelly-Holmes, 2019) to one in which Indigenous Peoples have an active and important voice in how technology is used, envisioned and created.”
From Decolonizing the digital landscape: the role of technology in Indigenous language revitalization (2021) · cites this paper as Kelly-Holmes, 2019
Cites
Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide
Norris, P. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139164887 · Cited by 2,921 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Decolonizing the digital landscape: the role of technology in Indigenous language revitalization
Meighan, P. J. (2021) · AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples · doi:10.1177/11771801211037672 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Exploring the presence of Cymraeg on TikTok
Cunliffe, D. (2025) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448241243096 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kelly-Holmes, H.
- ORCID
- Kelly-Holmes, Helen
- Venue
- Annual Review of Applied Linguistics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 39
- Pages
- 24-39
- ISSN
- 0267-1905 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-6356
- OpenAlex
- W2964222680
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 13.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Digital Communication and Language
- Keywords
- multilingualism, digital communication, internet, World Wide Web, monolingualism, Web 2.0, linguistic diversity, language technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review