Cited by 48Multilingual Education and PolicyLinguistic and Sociocultural StudiesDigital Communication and Language

Multilingualism and Technology: A Review of Developments in Digital Communication from Monolingualism to Idiolingualism

Kelly-Holmes, Helen·2019·Annual Review of Applied Linguistics

Abstract

The focus in this article is on the evolution of language and technology in relation to multilingualism, in particular on how multilingual provision has developed in tandem with the development of the internet and the World Wide Web (WWW). In trying to understand how multilingualism has evolved, it is also necessary to understand how the technical aspects of digital technology as well as the politico-economic dimensions to that technology have changed. Four distinct periods emerge in the development: monolingualism, multilingualism, hyperlingualism, and idiolingualism. Monolingualism covers the origins of the internet and later the WWW as monolingual spaces. This was followed by a long period that charts the slow but gradual development of increased language provision and what I am terming “partial multilingualism.” Multilingualism expanded substantially, potentially limitlessly, with the development of Web 2.0. This has involved the diversification of online spaces to the point of “hyperlingualism.” I argue that we are still in this hyperlingual phase, but alongside it, a new phase is developing, that of “idiolingualism” as a result of mass linguistic customization. In this article, I discuss these phases, paying attention to both their technical and economic contexts, as well as their implications for linguistic diversity online and in wider society.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0267190519000102

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 eras, Indigenous communities have gone beyond being recipients of information or collaborators to also being Internet 'Produsers' and creators.

    “In the Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 eras, Indigenous communities have gone beyond being recipients of information or collaborators to also being Internet “Produsers” (Kelly-Holmes, 2019) and creators.”
  • Tim Berners-Lee envisaged 'universality' and dictated the monolingual English design of the web.

    “For example, Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the World Wide Web, envisaged “universality” and “dictated the monolingual [English] design of the web” (Kelly-Holmes, 2019, p. 28).”
  • The role of technology in ILR has grown and evolved in a short space of time from being an extension of dominant Western hegemonies to one in which Indigenous Peoples have an active and important voice in how technology is used, envisioned and created.

    “The role of technology in ILR has grown and evolved in a short space of time from being an extension of dominant Western hegemonies (Kelly-Holmes, 2019) to one in which Indigenous Peoples have an active and important voice in how technology is used, envisioned and created.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kelly-Holmes, H.
Venue
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics
Published
2019-03
Volume
39
Pages
24-39
ISSN
  • 0267-1905 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-6356
OpenAlex
W2964222680
Cited by
48
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
13.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Digital Communication and Language
Keywords
multilingualism, digital communication, internet, World Wide Web, monolingualism, Web 2.0, linguistic diversity, language technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review