The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PRAGMATICS AND SLA
Abstract
Pragmatics has two roles in SLA: It acts as a constraint on linguistic forms and their acquisition, and it represents a type of communicative knowledge and object of L2 learning in its own right. The first role of pragmatics is evident in functionalist (Tomlin 1990) and interactionist (Long 1996) views of SLA. The second role puts pragmatics on a par with morphosyntax, lexis, and phonology in that inquiry focuses on learners' knowledge, use, and acquisition of L2 pragmatics. It is the latter sense of “pragmatics and SLA” that is the focus of this paper. In analogy with other areas of specialization within SLA—interlanguage syntax, interlanguage lexis, and so forth—the study of nonnative speakers' use and acquisition of L2 pragmatic knowledge is referred to as interlanguage pragmatics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Study of Second Language Acquisition
Brown, C., & Ellis, R. (1996) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/329065 · Cited by 4,199
The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition
Long, M. H. (1996) · Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1016/b978-012589042-7/50015-3 · Cited by 3,927
Social Identity, Investment, and Language Learning
Peirce, B. N. (1995) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587803 · Cited by 2,871
Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies
Kuhn, E. D., Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1991) · Language · doi:10.2307/415556 · Cited by 1,139
Self-citation(1997) · Cited by 863
Consciousness, Learning and Interlanguage Pragmatics
Schmidt, R. (1993) · Interlanguage Pragmatics · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195066029.003.0002 · Cited by 644
Bardovi-Harlig, K., Dörnyei, Z., & Dornyei, Z. (1998) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587583 · Cited by 577
Developmental Issues in Interlanguage Pragmatics
Kasper, G., & Schmidt, R. (1996) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100014868 · Cited by 564
Self-citationResponding to indirect speech acts
Clark, H. H. (1979) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(79)90020-3 · Cited by 484
Instructed second language acquisition
(2013) · Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research · doi:10.4324/9780203796580-9 · Cited by 448
Cited by
Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going
Taguchi, N. (2015) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444814000263 · Cited by 293
Kapranov, O. (2018) · Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture · doi:10.22364/bjellc.08.2018.04 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Applied Linguistics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 19
- Pages
- 81-104
- ISSN
- 0267-1905 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-6356
- OpenAlex
- W1974796774
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 20.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PRAGMATICS AND SLA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0267190599190056
- The paper
- Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (1999). PRAGMATICS AND SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190599190056
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.