The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Do Language Learners Recognize Pragmatic Violations? Pragmatic versus Grammatical Awareness in Instructed L2 Learning
Abstract
Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig, , Do Language Learners Recognize Pragmatic Violations? Pragmatic versus Grammatical Awareness in Instructed L2 Learning, TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 2 (Summer, 1998), pp. 233-262
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444812000365 · Cited by 741
IDENTIFYING THE IMPACT OF NEGATIVE FEEDBACK AND LEARNERS' RESPONSES ON ESL QUESTION DEVELOPMENT
McDonough, K. (2005) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263105050047 · Cited by 299
Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (1999) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190599190056 · Cited by 253
Synchronous CMC and Pragmatic Development
Sykes, J. (2005) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.v22i3.399-431 · Cited by 198
Beliefs about peer interaction and peer corrective feedback: Efficacy of classroom intervention
Sato, M. (2013) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12035.x · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Bardovi-Harlig, K., Dörnyei, Z., & Dornyei, Z.
- Venue
- TESOL Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 233
- ISSN
- 0039-8322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137226441
- Cited by
- 577
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do Language Learners Recognize Pragmatic Violations? Pragmatic versus Grammatical Awareness in Instructed L2 Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3587583
- The paper
- Bardovi-Harlig, K., Dörnyei, Z., & Dornyei, Z. (1998). Do Language Learners Recognize Pragmatic Violations? Pragmatic versus Grammatical Awareness in Instructed L2 Learning. TESOL Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587583
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
