The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A review of multi-instance learning assumptions
Abstract
Multi-instance (MI) learning is a variant of inductive machine learning, where each learning example contains a bag of instances instead of a single feature vector. The term commonly refers to the supervised setting, where each bag is associated with a label. This type of representation is a natural fit for a number of real-world learning scenarios, including drug activity prediction and image classification, hence many MI learning algorithms have been proposed. Any MI learning method must relate instances to bag-level class labels, but many types of relationships between instances and class labels are possible. Although all early work in MI learning assumes a specific MI concept class known to be appropriate for a drug activity prediction domain; this ‘standard MI assumption’ is not guaranteed to hold in other domains. Much of the recent work in MI learning has concentrated on a relaxed view of the MI problem, where the standard MI assumption is dropped, and alternative assumptions are considered instead. However, often it is not clearly stated what particular assumption is used and how it relates to other assumptions that have been proposed. In this paper, we aim to clarify the use of alternative MI assumptions by reviewing the work done in this area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A brief introduction to weakly supervised learning
Zhou, Z.-H. (2018) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwx106 · Cited by 1,899
Is object localization for free? - Weakly-supervised learning with convolutional neural networks
Oquab, M., Bottou, L., Laptev, I., & Sivic, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298668 · Cited by 886
Multiple instance learning: A survey of problem characteristics and applications
Carbonneau, M.-A., Cheplygina, V., Granger, E., & Gagnon, G. (2018) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2017.10.009 · Cited by 740
Multiple instance learning for histopathological breast cancer image classification
Sudharshan, P. J., Petitjean, C., Spanhol, F., Oliveira, L. E., Heutte, L., & Honeine, P. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.09.049 · Cited by 369
Cheplygina, V., de Bruijne, M., & Pluim, J. P. W. (2019) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2019.03.009 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Foulds, J., & Frank, E.
- Venue
- The Knowledge Engineering Review
- Publisher
- Maximum Academic Press
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-25
- ISSN
- 0269-8889 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8005
- OpenAlex
- W2125479168
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of multi-instance learning assumptions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s026988890999035x
- The paper
- Foulds, J., & Frank, E. (2010). A review of multi-instance learning assumptions. The Knowledge Engineering Review. https://doi.org/10.1017/s026988890999035x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.