The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Independent reinforcement learners in cooperative Markov games: a survey regarding coordination problems
Open accessAbstract
In the framework of fully cooperative multi-agent systems, independent (non-communicative) agents that learn by reinforcement must overcome several difficulties to manage to coordinate. This paper identifies several challenges responsible for the non-coordination of independent agents: Pareto-selection, non-stationarity, stochasticity, alter-exploration and shadowed equilibria. A selection of multi-agent domains is classified according to those challenges: matrix games, Boutilier's coordination game, predators pursuit domains and a special multi-state game. Moreover, the performance of a range of algorithms for independent reinforcement learners is evaluated empirically. Those algorithms are Q-learning variants: decentralized Q-learning, distributed Q-learning, hysteretic Q-learning, recursive frequency maximum Q-value and win-or-learn fast policy hill climbing. An overview of the learning algorithms’ strengths and weaknesses against each challenge concludes the paper and can serve as a basis for choosing the appropriate algorithm for a new domain. Furthermore, the distilled challenges may assist in the design of new learning algorithms that overcome these problems and achieve higher performance in multi-agent applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.1998.712192 · Cited by 27,225
Watkins, C. J. C. H., & Dayan, P. (1992) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00992698 · Cited by 9,083
Reinforcement Learning: A Survey
Kaelbling, L. P., Littman, M. L., & Moore, A. W. (1996) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.301 · Cited by 8,972
A Comprehensive Survey of Multiagent Reinforcement Learning
Busoniu, L., Babuska, R., & De Schutter, B. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2007.913919 · Cited by 2,235
Multiagent systems: A survey from a machine learning perspective
Stone, P., & Veloso, M. (2000) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1023/a:1008942012299 · Cited by 1,218
Cited by
Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environments
Lowe, R., Wu, Y., Tamar, A., Harb, J., Abbeel, P., & Mordatch, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.02275 · Cited by 3,377
Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning: a survey
Gronauer, S., & Diepold, K. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-021-09996-w · Cited by 957
Human-level performance in 3D multiplayer games with population-based reinforcement learning
Jaderberg, M., Czarnecki, W. M., Dunning, I., Marris, L., Lever, G., Castañeda, A. G., Beattie, C., Rabinowitz, N. C., Morcos, A. S., Ruderman, A., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau6249 · Cited by 662
A review of cooperative multi-agent deep reinforcement learning
Oroojlooy, A., & Hajinezhad, D. (2023) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-022-04105-y · Cited by 482
A Unified Game-Theoretic Approach to Multiagent Reinforcement Learning
Lanctot, M., Zambaldi, V., Gruslys, A., Lazaridou, A., Tuyls, K., Perolat, J., Silver, D., & Graepel, T. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.00832 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Matignon, L., Laurent, G. J., & Le Fort-Piat, N.
- Venue
- The Knowledge Engineering Review
- Publisher
- Maximum Academic Press
- Published
- 2012-02-22
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-31
- ISSN
- 0269-8889 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8005
- OpenAlex
- W2096145798
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Independent reinforcement learners in cooperative Markov games: a survey regarding coordination problems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0269888912000057
- The paper
- Matignon, L., Laurent, G. J., & Le Fort-Piat, N. (2012). Independent reinforcement learners in cooperative Markov games: a survey regarding coordination problems. The Knowledge Engineering Review. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0269888912000057
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.