The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Enterprise Ontology
Abstract
This is a comprehensive description of the Enterprise Ontology, a collection of terms and definitions relevant to business enterprises. We state its intended purposes, describe how we went about building it, define all the terms and describe our experiences in converting these into formal definitions. We then describe how we used the Enterprise Ontology and give an evaluation which compares the actual uses with original purposes. We conclude by summarising what we have learned. The Enterprise Ontology was developed within the Enterprise Project, a collaborative effort to provide a framework for enterprise modelling. The ontology was built to serve as a basis for this framework which includes methods and a computer tool set for enterprise modelling. We give an overview of the Enterprise Project, elaborate on the intended use of the ontology, and give a brief overview of the process we went through to build it. The scope of the Enterprise Ontology covers those core concepts required for the project, which will appeal to a wider audience. We present natural language definitions for all the terms, starting with the foundational concepts (e.g. entity, relationship, actor). These are used to define the main body of terms, which are divided into the following subject areas: activities, organisation, strategy and marketing. We review some of the things learned during the formalisation process of converting the natural language definitions into Ontolingua. We identify and propose solutions for what may be general problems occurring in the development of a wide range of ontologies in other domains. We then characterise in general terms the sorts of issues that will be faced when converting an informal ontology into a formal one. Finally, we describe our experiences in using the Enterprise Ontology. We compare these with the intended uses, noting our successes and failures. We conclude with an overall evaluation and summary of what we have learned.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The business model ontology a proposition in a design science approach
Osterwalder, A. (2004) · Unknown · doi:10.22005/bcu.15985 · Cited by 1,932
Formal Ontology in Information Systems: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference (FOIS 2025)
(2025) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications · doi:10.3233/faia409 · Cited by 470
Text mining and ontologies in biomedicine: Making sense of raw text
Spasic, I., Ananiadou, S., McNaught, J., & Kumar, A. (2005) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/6.3.239 · Cited by 299
Semantic interoperability in the Internet of Things: An overview from the INTER-IoT perspective
Ganzha, M., Paprzycki, M., Pawłowski, W., Szmeja, P., & Wasielewska, K. (2017) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2016.08.007 · Cited by 208
The Process Specification Language (PSL) overview and version 1.0 specification
Schlenoff, C., Gruninger, M., Tissot, F., Valois, J., & Lee, J. (2000) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.6459 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- USCHOLD, M., KING, M., MORALEE, S., & ZORGIOS, Y.
- Venue
- The Knowledge Engineering Review
- Publisher
- Maximum Academic Press
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-89
- ISSN
- 0269-8889 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8005
- OpenAlex
- W2165242406
- Cited by
- 920
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Enterprise Ontology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0269888998001088
- The paper
- USCHOLD, M., KING, M., MORALEE, S., & ZORGIOS, Y. (1998). The Enterprise Ontology. The Knowledge Engineering Review. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0269888998001088
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.