The business model ontology a proposition in a design science approach
Open accessAbstract
The goal of this dissertation is to find and provide the basis for a managerial tool that allows a firm to easily express its business logic. The methodological basis for this work is design science, where the researcher builds an artifact to solve a specific problem. In this case the aim is to provide an ontology that makes it possible to explicit a firm's business model. In other words, the proposed artifact helps a firm to formally describe its value proposition, its customers, the relationship with them, the necessary intra- and inter-firm infrastructure and its profit model. Such an ontology is relevant because until now there is no model that expresses a company's global business logic from a pure business point of view. Previous models essentially take an organizational or process perspective or cover only parts of a firm's business logic. The four main pillars of the ontology, which are inspired by management science and enterprise- and processmodeling, are product, customer interface, infrastructure and finance. The ontology is validated by case studies, a panel of experts and managers. The dissertation also provides a software prototype to capture a company's business model in an information system. The last part of the thesis consists of a demonstration of the value of the ontology in business strategy and Information Systems (IS) alignment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Coase, R. H. (1937) · Economica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x · Cited by 23,972 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The business model: Recent developments and future research
Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311406265 · Cited by 4,790 · see citing works
Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers
Chesbrough, H. (2010) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010 · Cited by 3,850 · see citing works
Lüdeke‐Freund, F. (2020) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2396 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Business Model Innovation as Lever of Organizational Sustainability
Carayannis, E. G., Sindakis, S., & Walter, C. (2015) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-013-9330-y · Cited by 299 · see citing works
An integrated patient journey mapping tool for embedding quality in healthcare service reform
McCarthy, S., O’Raghallaigh, P., Woodworth, S., Lim, Y. L., Kenny, L. C., & Adam, F. (2016) · Journal of Decision Systems · doi:10.1080/12460125.2016.1187394 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Business model design and innovation: Unlocking the performance benefits of innovation
Gronum, S., Steen, J., & Verreynne, M.-L. (2016) · Australian Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0312896215587315 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Product-Service System Business Modelling Methodology Using Morphological Analysis
Kwon, M., Lee, J., & Hong, Y. S. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11051376 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
- Authors
- Osterwalder, A.
- Corresponding author
- Osterwalder, Alexander
- Venue
- Unknown
- Publisher
- Unknown
- Published
- 0000
- OpenAlex
- W2049318638
- Cited by
- 1,932
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 153 · 2020: 115 · 2019: 134 · 2018: 149 · 2017: 139 · 2016: 140 · 2015: 152 · 2014: 143 · 2013: 126 · 2012: 95
- FWCI
- 41.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- IRIS (submittedVersion)
- SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
- BCU
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Business Process Modeling and Analysis
- Keywords
- business model ontology, business models, business logic, value proposition, customer relationships, business infrastructure, profit model, enterprise modeling, process modeling, information systems alignment, business strategy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review