Cited by 1,932Information Technology Governance and StrategyBusiness Strategies and InnovationBusiness Process Modeling and Analysis

The business model ontology a proposition in a design science approach

Open access
Osterwalder, Alexander·2004·Unknown

Abstract

The goal of this dissertation is to find and provide the basis for a managerial tool that allows a firm to easily express its business logic. The methodological basis for this work is design science, where the researcher builds an artifact to solve a specific problem. In this case the aim is to provide an ontology that makes it possible to explicit a firm's business model. In other words, the proposed artifact helps a firm to formally describe its value proposition, its customers, the relationship with them, the necessary intra- and inter-firm infrastructure and its profit model. Such an ontology is relevant because until now there is no model that expresses a company's global business logic from a pure business point of view. Previous models essentially take an organizational or process perspective or cover only parts of a firm's business logic. The four main pillars of the ontology, which are inspired by management science and enterprise- and processmodeling, are product, customer interface, infrastructure and finance. The ontology is validated by case studies, a panel of experts and managers. The dissertation also provides a software prototype to capture a company's business model in an information system. The last part of the thesis consists of a demonstration of the value of the ontology in business strategy and Information Systems (IS) alignment.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.22005/bcu.15985

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Osterwalder, A.
Corresponding author
Osterwalder, Alexander
Venue
Unknown
Publisher
Unknown
Published
0000
OpenAlex
W2049318638
Cited by
1,932
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 153 · 2020: 115 · 2019: 134 · 2018: 149 · 2017: 139 · 2016: 140 · 2015: 152 · 2014: 143 · 2013: 126 · 2012: 95
FWCI
41.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • BCU
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Business Process Modeling and Analysis
Keywords
business model ontology, business models, business logic, value proposition, customer relationships, business infrastructure, profit model, enterprise modeling, process modeling, information systems alignment, business strategy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review