The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attainment of Syntactic and Morphological Accuracy by Advanced Language Learners
Abstract
The present study examines the relationship between syntactic development, or complexity, and overall accuracy evidenced in the written English of advanced adult foreign language learners. Similar acquisition profiles were found to exist for 30 learners across five language groups: Arabic, Chinese, Korean, Malay, and Spanish. Syntactic complexity, measured in number of clauses per T-unit, is found to be similar in all five groups. These advanced foreign language learners, who show similar patterns of error distribution, all show relative strength in syntax, what Newport, Gleitman, and Gleitman (1977) call a universal design feature of language, but relative weakness in morphology, which is always a language-specific system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maturational constraints on language development.
Long, M. H. (1990) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100009165 · Cited by 1,090
Cited by
Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections
Storch, N. (2005) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002 · Cited by 1,052
The Structural Syllabus and Second Language Acquisition
Ellis, R. (1993) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586953 · Cited by 482
The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality
Min, H.-T. (2006) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003 · Cited by 482
Measuring Syntactic Complexity in L2 Writing Using Fine‐Grained Clausal and Phrasal Indices
KYLE, K., & CROSSLEY, S. A. (2018) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12468 · Cited by 405
Lu, X., & Ai, H. (2015) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.003 · Cited by 350
Yang, W., Lu, X., & Weigle, S. C. (2015) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2015.02.002 · Cited by 349
Metatalk in a Pair Work Activity: Level of Engagement and Implications for Language Development
Storch, N. (2008) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658410802146644 · Cited by 329
Dynamic Development in Speaking Versus Writing in Identical Twins
Chan, H., Verspoor, M., & Vahtrick, L. (2015) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12107 · Cited by 68
An exploratory study into the dynamics of Chinese L2 writing development
Hou, J., Verspoor, M., & Loerts, H. (2016) · Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1075/dujal.5.1.04loe · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bofman, T.
- Venue
- Studies in Second Language Acquisition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1989-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-34
- ISSN
- 0272-2631 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1545
- OpenAlex
- W2061898206
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
