The DOI matches its Crossref record.
BEYOND SEGMENTS: Prosody in SLA
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Much of the empirical basis for these models derives from segmental research, though, particularly on vowels, limiting their explanatory reach for suprasegmental acquisition (Gorba & Cebrian, 2021;Mennen & de Leeuw, 2014).”
From On English Language Learners’ Prosody: The Possible Impact of L2 Aptitude, Musical Ability, and Proficiency on Nuclear Accent Placement in Spanish L1 Contexts (2026) · cites this paper as Mennen & de Leeuw, 2014
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 56
- Shen, 1989, Toward a register approach in teaching Mandarin tones, Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association, 24, 27
- 10.1017/S0272263100013735 · DOI
- Cutler, 2006, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Speech Prosody, 237
- Munro, 2001, Modeling perceptions of the accentedness and comprehensibility of L2 speech: The role of speaking rate, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 451, 10.1017/S0272263101004016 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.wocn.2004.02.002 · DOI
- 10.1177/00238309030460040201 · DOI
- 10.1075/sibil.36.17der · DOI
- Lehiste, 1970, Suprasegmentals
- 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0889-4906(03)00020-6 · DOI
- 10.1002/9780470757024.ch11 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb01043.x · DOI
- 10.1080/01690965.2010.492641 · DOI
- 10.1121/1.401770 · DOI
- Gut, 2003, Prosody in second language speech production: The role of the native language, Fremdsprachen Lehren und Lernen, 32, 133
- 10.1515/ling.1997.35.1.167 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0267190500200135 · DOI
- Cruz-Ferreira, 1989, A test for non-native comprehension of intonation in English, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 17, 23
- Atoye, 2005, Non-native perception and interpretation of English intonation, Nordic Journal of African Studies, 14, 26
- 10.1515/iral.1990.28.2.119 · DOI
- Miracle, 1989, Tone production of American students of Chinese: A preliminary acoustic study, Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association, 24, 49
- 10.1007/BF01758181 · DOI
- Banjo, 1979, Varieties and functions of English in Nigeria, 7
- 10.1017/S0142716408080247 · DOI
- Ladd, 1996, Intonational phonology
- Carter, 2005, Prosodic variation in SLA: Rhythm in an urban North Carolina Hispanic community, Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, 11, 59
- 10.1121/1.3681950 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0142716407070130 · DOI
- 10.2307/327199 · DOI
- 10.1006/jpho.1998.0081 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263197001010 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmla.1996.2500 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263197004026 · DOI
- 10.3726/978-3-653-01155-5 · DOI
- Gandour, 1983, Tone perception in Far Eastern languages, Journal of Phonetics, 11, 149, 10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30813-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Jilka, 2000, The contribution of intonation to the perception of foreign accent
- 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00283.x · DOI
- Boula de Mareüil, 2004, Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Speech Prosody, Nara, Japan, 681
- 10.1177/0023830909357156 · DOI
- 10.1006/jpho.1996.0031 · DOI
- Cruz-Ferreira, 1987, Sound patterns in second language acquisition, 103
- 10.1121/1.3500688 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01708572 · DOI
- Altmann, 2006, The perception and production of second language stress: A cross-linguistic experimental study
- Grenon, 2008, Proceedings of the 32nd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 155
- Chen, 1974, The pitch range of English and Chinese speakers, Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 2, 159
- 10.1159/000097308 · DOI
- 10.1177/00238309040470040101 · DOI
- 10.1121/1.1531176 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.system.2010.01.005 · DOI
- 10.1006/jpho.2001.0134 · DOI
- 10.1075/sibil.36.10mun · DOI
- 10.1016/j.wocn.2007.02.003 · DOI
- Carmichael, 2000, Measurable degrees of foreign accent: A correlational study of production, perception, and acquisition
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.001 · DOI
- 10.1177/002383099704000203 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barra–García, C. F., Véliz-Campos, M., Figueroa Candia, M. A., Pereira-Reyes, Y., & Kartsevski Dune, M. (2026) · Language Teaching Research Quarterly · doi:10.32038/ltrq.2026.55.04
Metadata
- Authors
- Mennen, I., & de Leeuw, E.
- Venue
- Studies in Second Language Acquisition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2014-05-20
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 183-194
- ISSN
- 0272-2631
- 1470-1545
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review