Cited by 45Phonetics and Phonology ResearchEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

OBSERVING PITCH GESTURES FAVORS THE LEARNING OF SPANISH INTONATION BY MANDARIN SPEAKERS

Open access
Yuan, Chenjie, González-Fuente, Santiago, Baills, Florence, Prieto, Pilar·2019·Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Abstract

Abstract Recent studies on the learning of L2 prosody have suggested that pitch gestures can enhance the learning of the L2 lexical tones. Yet it remains unclear whether the use of these gestures can aid the learning of L2 intonation, especially by tonal-language speakers. Sixty-four Mandarin speakers with basic-level Spanish were asked to learn three Spanish intonation patterns, all involving a low tone on the nuclear accent. In a pre-post test experimental design, half of the participants received intonation training without the use of pitch gestures (the control group) while the other half received the same training but with pitch gestures representing nuclear intonation contours (the experimental group). Musical (melody, pitch) abilities were also measured. The results revealed that (a) the experimental group significantly improved intonational production outcomes, and (b) even though participants with stronger musical abilities performed better, those with weaker musical abilities benefited more from observing pitch gestures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0272263117000316

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Alexander, J. A., Wong, P. C. M., & Bradlow, A. R. (2005). Lexical tone perception in musicians and non- musicians. In INTERSPEECH (Ed.), Proceeding of the (Eurospeech) 9th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (pp. 397-400). Lisbon: ISCA.
  2. Barto, K. A. (2015). Mandarin speakers' intonation in their L2 English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona.
  3. Bidelman, G. M., Gandour, J. T., & Krishnan, A. (2011). Cross-domain effects of music and language experience on the representation of pitch in the human auditory brainstem. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 425-434.
  4. Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989). Investigating cross-cultural pragmatics: An introductory overview. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House, & G. Kasper (Eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies (pp. 1-34). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  5. Cruz-Ferreira, M. (1989). Non-native interpretive strategies for intonational meaning: An experimental study. In A. James & J. Leather (Eds.), Sound patterns in second language acquisition (pp. 103-120). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
  6. Dolscheid, S., Willems, R. M., Hagoort, P., & Casasanto, D. (2014). The relation of space and musical pitch in the brain. In P. Bello, M. Guarini, M. McShane, & B. Scassellati (Eds.), 36th annual meeting of the cognitive science society (CogSci 2014) (pp. 421-426). Quebec: Cognitive Science Society.
  7. Dong, Y. S., & Liu, J. (2014). Español Moderno, Libro del Alumno I. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
  8. Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2010). Data collection methods in speech act performance: DCTs, role plays, and verbal reports. In A. Martínez-Flor & E. Usó-Juan (Eds.), Speech act performance: Theoretical, empirical, and methodological issues (pp. 41-56). Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
  9. Flege, J. (1991). Orthographic evidence for the perceptual identification of vowels in Spanish and English. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 701-731.
  10. Gao, G., & Qin, H. W. (2012). The influence of Chinese experience on English phonetic acquisition at suprasegmental level. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching Journal, 151, 52-57.
  11. Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  12. González-Fuente, S., Escandell-Vidal, V., & Prieto, P. (2015). Gestural codas pave the way to the understanding of verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 26-47.
  13. Gullberg, M. (2006). Some reasons for studying gesture and second language acquisition (Hommage à Adam Kendon). IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 44, 103-124.
  14. He, X. L., van Heuven, V. J., & Gussenhoven, C. (2011). Choosing the optimal pitch accent location in Dutch by Chinese learners and native listeners. In M. Wrembel, M. Kul, & K. Dziubalska-Kolaczyk (Eds.), Achievements and perspectives in SLA of speech: New sounds 2010 (pp. 125-137). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag.
  15. Hirata, Y., & Kelly, S. D. (2010). Effects of lips and hands on auditory learning of second-language speech sounds. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 298-310.
  16. Hirata, Y., Kelly, S. D., Huang, J., & Manansala, M. (2014). Effects of hand gestures on auditory learning of second-language vowel length contrasts. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 2090-2101.
  17. Hong, W. (2012). An experimental study of Chinese students' English intonation pattern (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). China: Nankai University.
  18. Hualde, J. I., & Prieto, P. (2015). Intonational variation in Spanish: European and American varieties. In S. Frota & P. Prieto (Eds.), Intonation in romance (pp. 350-391). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  19. Ji, X. L. (2010). Acquisition of intonation by Chinese EFL learners-An empirical study based on experimental phonetics (Unpublished master's thesis). China: Zhejiang University.
  20. Ji, X. L., Wang, X., & Li, A. J. (2009). Intonation patterns of yes-no questions for Chinese EFL learners. In IEEE (Ed.), 2016 Conference of the Oriental Chapter of International Committee for Coordination and Standardization of Speech Databases and Assessment Techniques (O-COCOSDA). New York: Curran Associates, Inc.
  21. Kendon, A. (1980). Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In M. Key (Ed.), The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication (pp. 207-227). The Hague: Mouton.
  22. Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  23. Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202-251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Law, L. (2012). Assessing and understanding individual differences in music perception abilities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). York: University of York.
  25. Lee, C. Y., & Huang, T. H. (2008). Identification of Mandarin tones by English-speaking musicians and nonmusicians. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124, 3235-3248.
  26. Levinson, S. C., & Holler, J. (2014). The origin of human communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 369, 227-246.
  27. Liu, Y. H. (2003). La entonación del español hablado por taiwaneses (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona.
  28. Marques, C., Moreno, S., Castro, S. L., & Besson, M. (2007). Musicians detect pitch violation in a foreign language better than nonmusicians: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1453-1463.
  29. McCafferty, S. G. (2006). Gesture and the materialization of second language prosody. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 44, 197-209.
  30. McMullen, E., & Saffran, J. R. (2004). Music and language: A developmental comparison. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 289-311.
  31. McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  32. Mennen, I. (2015). Beyond segments: Towards a L2 intonation learning theory. In E. Delais-Roussarie, M. Avanzi, & S. Herment (Eds.), Prosody and language in contact (pp. 171-188). Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.
  33. Morales, S. P. (2008). Enseñanza de la pronunciación del español en estudiantes chinos: La importancia de las destrezas y los contenidos prosódicos. In S. P. Cesteros & S. R. Martin (Eds.), La evaluación en el aprendizaje y la enseñanza del español como lengua extranjera/segunda lengua: XVIII Congreso Inter- nacional de la Asociación para la Enseñanza del Español como lengua Extranjera (ASELE) (pp. 497-503). Alicante: Universidad de Alicante.
  34. Ostrom, A. B. W. (1997). Acquisition of American English intonation patterns by non-native speakers: Use of real-time computer-mediated visual feedback (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Austin, TX: The University of Texas at Austin.
  35. Shimizu, M., & Taniguchi, M. (2005). Reaffirming the effect of interactive visual feedback on teaching English intonation to Japanese learners. Paper presented at the Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference 2005. London: University of London.
  36. Slevc, L. R. (2012). Language and music: Sound, structure, and meaning. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3, 483-492.
  37. Su, Z. B., & Hu, D. (2011). An empirical study on SLA learners' intonation acquisition of general questions, focusing on the syllable number of the last word. Journal of Hubei University of Education, 28, 94-97.
  38. Tavakoli, H. (2013). A dictionary of research methodology and statistics in applied linguistics. Tehran: Rahanama Press.
  39. Xu, H. M. (2009). A survey study of Chinese EFL learners' acquisition of English intonation: A functional perspective (Unpublished master's thesis). China: Jiangsu University.
  40. Zhao, T. C., & Kuhl, P. K. (2015). Effect of musical experience on learning lexical tone categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137, 1452-1463.

Authors
Yuan, C., González-Fuente, S., Baills, F., & Prieto, P.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
Corresponding author
Yuan, Chenjie
Venue
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
Published
2018-01-02
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
5-32
ISSN
  • 0272-2631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-1545
OpenAlex
W2781942462
Cited by
45
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
4.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Studies in Second Language Acquisition (publishedVersion)
  • Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Generalitat de Catalunya (SGR 925, 2014SGR)
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (FFI2015-66533-P)
  • Xi'an International Studies University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
Spanish intonation, Mandarin speakers, nuclear accent, musical ability, melody

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review