The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Early syntactic creativity: a usage-based approach
Abstract
The aim of the current study was to determine the degree to which a sample of one child's creative utterances related to utterances that the child previously produced. The utterances to be accounted for were all of the intelligible, multi-word utterances produced by the child in a single hour of interaction with her mother early in her third year of life (at age 2;1.11). We used a high-density database consisting of 5 hours of recordings per week together with a maternal diary for the previous 6 weeks. Of the 295 multi-word utterances on tape, 37% were ‘novel’ in the sense that they had not been said in their entirety before. Using a morpheme-matching method, we identified the way(s) in which each novel utterance differed from its closest match in the preceding corpus. In 74% of the cases we required only one operation to match the previous utterance and the great majority of these consisted of the substitution of a word (usually a noun) into a previous utterance or schema. Almost all the other single-operation utterances involved adding a word onto the beginning or end of a previous utterance. 26% of the novel, multi-word utterances required more than one operation to match the closest previous utterance, although many of these only involved a combination of the two operations seen for the single-operation utterances. Some others were, however, more complex to match. The results suggest that the relatively high degree of creativity in early English child language could be at least partially based upon entrenched schemas and a small number of simple operations to modify them. We discuss the implications of these results for the interplay in language production between strings registered in memory and categorial knowledge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Foundations of Cognitive Grammar
Winters, M. E., & Langacker, R. W. (1988) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/327796 · Cited by 5,665
A First Language: The Early Stages
Gardner, R. A., Gardner, B. T., & Brown, R. (1974) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421982 · Cited by 4,172
Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective
Croft, W. (2001) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 · Cited by 2,910
The Architecture of the Language Faculty
Aitchison, J., & Jackendoff, R. (1998) · Language · doi:10.2307/417010 · Cited by 1,991
Regular morphology and the lexicon
Bybee, J. (1995) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690969508407111 · Cited by 1,541
Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure
Pinker, S. (2013) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9700.001.0001 · Cited by 1,452
Language development: Form and function in emerging grammars
Bloom, L. M. (1970) · Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University) · doi:10.7916/d8s75gt1 · Cited by 1,320
Do young children have adult syntactic competence?
Tomasello, M. (2000) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00069-4 · Cited by 1,013
Self-citationThe Units of Language Acquisition
Frawley, W., & Peters, A. M. (1985) · Language · doi:10.2307/413467 · Cited by 880
First Verbs: A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development
Brooks, P. J., & Tomasello, M. (1994) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1423044 · Cited by 684
Self-citation
Cited by
Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. (2006) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.113.2.234 · Cited by 984
A construction based analysis of child directed speech
Cameron‐Faulkner, T., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2003) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2706_2 · Cited by 592
Self-citationBannard, C., & Matthews, D. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02075.x · Cited by 518
Towards a lexically specific grammar of children’s question constructions
Dąbrowska, E., & Lieven, E. (2005) · cogl · doi:10.1515/cogl.2005.16.3.437 · Cited by 418
Self-citationImplicit statistical learning is directly associated with the acquisition of syntax
Kidd, E. (2012) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025405 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- LIEVEN, E., BEHRENS, H., SPEARES, J., & TOMASELLO, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Child Language
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 333-370
- ISSN
- 0305-0009 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7602
- OpenAlex
- W2164757945
- Cited by
- 538
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 23.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Early syntactic creativity: a usage-based approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0305000903005592
- The paper
- LIEVEN, E., BEHRENS, H., SPEARES, J., & TOMASELLO, M. (2003). Early syntactic creativity: a usage-based approach. Journal of Child Language. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000903005592
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.