The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Usage-based vs. rule-based learning: the acquisition of word order in wh-questions in English and Norwegian
Open accessAbstract
This paper discusses different approaches to language acquisition in relation to children's acquisition of word order in wh-questions in English and Norwegian. While generative models assert that children set major word order parameters and thus acquire a rule of subject–auxiliary inversion or generalized verb second (V2) at an early stage, some constructivist work argues that English-speaking children are simply reproducing frequent wh-word+auxiliary combinations in the input. The paper questions both approaches, re-evaluates some previous work, and provides some further data, concluding that the acquisition of wh-questions must be the result of a rule-based process. Based on variation in adult grammars, a cue-based model to language acquisition is presented, according to which children are sensitive to minor cues in the input, called micro-cues. V2 is not considered to be one major parameter, but several smaller-scale cues, which are responsible for children's lack of syntactic (over-)generalization in the acquisition process.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Finally, it is important to note that an explanation of the frequency effects outlined in this section need not necessarily incorporate the assumption of item-based frames.”
From The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition (2015) · cites this paper as Westergaard's (2009)
Citations
Cites
Subject–auxiliary inversion errors and wh-question acquisition: ‘what children do know?’
ROWLAND, C. F., & PINE, J. M. (2000) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000999004055 · Cited by 199
AMBRIDGE, B., ROWLAND, C. F., THEAKSTON, A. L., & TOMASELLO, M. (2006) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000906007513 · Cited by 65
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.05.003 · DOI
- Vikner, 1995, Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages, 10.1093/oso/9780195083934.001.0001 · DOI
- Tomasello, 2003, Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition
- 10.1007/s10828-009-9025-9 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-94-011-2803-2_2 · DOI
- Vangsnes, 2005, Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 5, 187
- Chomsky, 1986, Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use
- 10.1515/9783110977905.271 · DOI
- Santelmann L. (1995). The acquisition of verb second grammar in child Swedish: Continuity of Universal Grammar in WH-questions, topicalizations and verb raising. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
- 10.1017/S1366728999000310 · DOI
- Snyder, 2007, Child language: The parametric approach, 10.1093/oso/9780199296699.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.4159/harvard.9780674732469 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9780511616204 · DOI
- Lightfoot, 1999, The development of language: Acquisition, change and evolution
- 10.1007/978-94-010-0798-6 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0305000902005445 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01067137 · DOI
- 10.1515/ling.1990.28.6.1407 · DOI
- Anderssen M. (2006). The acquisition of compositional definiteness in Norwegian. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Tromsø.
- 10.1037/0012-1649.19.3.440 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0305000903005695 · DOI · Paper page
- Rizzi, 2001, Current studies in Italian syntax, 287, 10.1163/9780585473949_016 · DOI
- Bhatt, 2004, Handbook of varieties of English 2: Morphology and syntax, 1016
- Rizzi, 1996, Parameters and functional heads, 63, 10.1093/oso/9780195087932.003.0003 · DOI
- Kroch, 1997, Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 297
- 10.1207/s15327817la0304_3 · DOI
- 10.1515/cogl.12.2.97 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0305000901004974 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0305000902005299 · DOI
- MacWhinney, 2000, The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk, 2
- 10.1515/prbs.2004.16.2.241 · DOI
- Tomasello, 2006, Handbook of child psychology, 255
- 10.1075/lald.45.03wes · DOI
- 10.1017/S0332586503001021 · DOI
- 10.1515/9783110977905.23 · DOI
- Henry, 1995, Belfast English and Standard English, 10.1093/oso/9780195082913.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.2307/416414 · DOI
- DeVilliers, 1991, Papers in the acquisition of wh: Proceedings of the Umass Roundtable, May 1990
- 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00023.x · DOI
Cited by
The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition
AMBRIDGE, B., KIDD, E., ROWLAND, C. F., & THEAKSTON, A. L. (2015) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s030500091400049x · Cited by 589
Metadata
- Authors
- WESTERGAARD, M.
- Affiliations
- UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
- Corresponding author
- WESTERGAARD, MARIT
- ORCID
- WESTERGAARD, MARIT
- Venue
- Journal of Child Language
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2009-03-09
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1023-1051
- ISSN
- 0305-0009 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7602
- OpenAlex
- W2120649630
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 14 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Child Language (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Keywords
- wh-questions, word order acquisition, subject-auxiliary inversion, usage-based learning, rule-based learning, English language, Norwegian, child language acquisition
- MeSH terms
- Child Language, Child, Preschool, Cues, Female, Humans, Infant, Language, Learning, Linguistics, Male, Models, Psychological, Norway, Speech
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.