Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 63Language Development and DisordersSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic VariationEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Usage-based vs. rule-based learning: the acquisition of word order in wh-questions in English and Norwegian

Open access
WESTERGAARD, MARIT·2009·Journal of Child Language

Abstract

This paper discusses different approaches to language acquisition in relation to children's acquisition of word order in wh-questions in English and Norwegian. While generative models assert that children set major word order parameters and thus acquire a rule of subject–auxiliary inversion or generalized verb second (V2) at an early stage, some constructivist work argues that English-speaking children are simply reproducing frequent wh-word+auxiliary combinations in the input. The paper questions both approaches, re-evaluates some previous work, and provides some further data, concluding that the acquisition of wh-questions must be the result of a rule-based process. Based on variation in adult grammars, a cue-based model to language acquisition is presented, according to which children are sensitive to minor cues in the input, called micro-cues. V2 is not considered to be one major parameter, but several smaller-scale cues, which are responsible for children's lack of syntactic (over-)generalization in the acquisition process.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0305000909009349

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.05.003 · DOI
  2. Vikner, 1995, Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages, 10.1093/oso/9780195083934.001.0001 · DOI
  3. Tomasello, 2003, Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition
  4. 10.1007/s10828-009-9025-9 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/978-94-011-2803-2_2 · DOI
  6. Vangsnes, 2005, Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 5, 187
  7. Chomsky, 1986, Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use
  8. 10.1515/9783110977905.271 · DOI
  9. Santelmann L. (1995). The acquisition of verb second grammar in child Swedish: Continuity of Universal Grammar in WH-questions, topicalizations and verb raising. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
  10. 10.1017/S1366728999000310 · DOI
  11. Snyder, 2007, Child language: The parametric approach, 10.1093/oso/9780199296699.001.0001 · DOI
  12. 10.4159/harvard.9780674732469 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1017/CBO9780511616204 · DOI
  14. Lightfoot, 1999, The development of language: Acquisition, change and evolution
  15. 10.1007/978-94-010-0798-6 · DOI
  16. 10.1017/S0305000902005445 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/BF01067137 · DOI
  18. 10.1515/ling.1990.28.6.1407 · DOI
  19. Anderssen M. (2006). The acquisition of compositional definiteness in Norwegian. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Tromsø.
  20. 10.1037/0012-1649.19.3.440 · DOI
  21. 10.1017/S0305000903005695 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Rizzi, 2001, Current studies in Italian syntax, 287, 10.1163/9780585473949_016 · DOI
  23. Bhatt, 2004, Handbook of varieties of English 2: Morphology and syntax, 1016
  24. Rizzi, 1996, Parameters and functional heads, 63, 10.1093/oso/9780195087932.003.0003 · DOI
  25. Kroch, 1997, Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 297
  26. 10.1207/s15327817la0304_3 · DOI
  27. 10.1515/cogl.12.2.97 · DOI
  28. 10.1017/S0305000901004974 · DOI
  29. 10.1017/S0305000902005299 · DOI
  30. MacWhinney, 2000, The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk, 2
  31. 10.1515/prbs.2004.16.2.241 · DOI
  32. Tomasello, 2006, Handbook of child psychology, 255
  33. 10.1075/lald.45.03wes · DOI
  34. 10.1017/S0332586503001021 · DOI
  35. 10.1515/9783110977905.23 · DOI
  36. Henry, 1995, Belfast English and Standard English, 10.1093/oso/9780195082913.001.0001 · DOI
  37. 10.2307/416414 · DOI
  38. DeVilliers, 1991, Papers in the acquisition of wh: Proceedings of the Umass Roundtable, May 1990
  39. 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00023.x · DOI

Cited by

See all 63

Metadata

Authors
WESTERGAARD, M.
Affiliations
UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Corresponding author
WESTERGAARD, MARIT
Venue
Journal of Child Language
Published
2009-03-09
Volume
36
Issue
5
Pages
1023-1051
ISSN
  • 0305-0009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7602
OpenAlex
W2120649630
Cited by
63
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 14 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Language (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
wh-questions, word order acquisition, subject-auxiliary inversion, usage-based learning, rule-based learning, English language, Norwegian, child language acquisition
MeSH terms
Child Language, Child, Preschool, Cues, Female, Humans, Infant, Language, Learning, Linguistics, Male, Models, Psychological, Norway, Speech

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.