The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relationships between lexical and phonological development in young children*
Abstract
Our understanding of the relationships between lexical and phonological development has been enhanced in recent years by increased interest in this area from language scientists, psychologists and phonologists. This review article provides a summary of research, highlighting similarities and differences across studies. It is suggested that the research falls into two categories with different goals and different methodological approaches: (1) child-centered studies that examine the influences active in the prelinguistic and early-word period, emphasizing individual developmental patterns and the active role played by the child; and (2) studies inspired by research on word processing in adults; these focus on the effects of the phonological and lexical characteristics of the ambient language on underlying representations and word learning in children. The article concludes with suggestions for integrating the findings from the two approaches and for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1967) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,532
Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968) · Cited by 5,162
Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar
Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (2004) · Optimality Theory in Phonology · doi:10.1002/9780470756171.ch1 · Cited by 4,683
Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children
Panagos, R. J. (1998) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/074193259801900609 · Cited by 4,173
Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-3435 · Cited by 4,103
Bybee, J. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511612886 · Cited by 2,400
Hoff, E. (2003) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00612 · Cited by 2,346
Ellis, N. C. (2002) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263102002024 · Cited by 2,230 · cited 1×
“In adults, word frequency affects processing in both perception and production: high-frequency words are associated with faster word recognition and are produced more quickly and more accurately (see Ellis, 2002).”
BackgroundRecognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model
Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/00003446-199802000-00001 · Cited by 1,939
How Children Learn the Meanings of Words
Bloom, P. (2000) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3577.001.0001 · Cited by 1,922
Cited by
Against stored abstractions: A radical exemplar model of language acquisition
Ambridge, B. (2020) · First Language · doi:10.1177/0142723719869731 · Cited by 185
Edmunds, S. R., Kover, S. T., & Stone, W. L. (2019) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.2100 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- STOEL-GAMMON, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Child Language
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2010-10-18
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-34
- ISSN
- 0305-0009 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7602
- OpenAlex
- W2108409919
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 79
- FWCI
- 21.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationships between lexical and phonological development in young children*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0305000910000425
- The paper
- STOEL-GAMMON, C. (2011). Relationships between lexical and phonological development in young children*. Journal of Child Language. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000910000425
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.