The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Institutional Process of Market Clientelism: Guanxi and Private Business in a South China City
Abstract
Patron—client ties are pervasive in the post-Mao economy between entrepreneurs operating private firms and cadres staffing the state's administrative, distributive and production organs. The burgeoning literature on private business is converging on a view of them as localized exchanges of commercial wealth for bureaucratic power. These deviations from central policies and standard procedures enable entrepreneurs to manage their dependence on local authorities while giving officials new sources of income that buttress their power within jurisdictions. However, less attention has been paid to the ties themselves. This article shifts the focus from patron–client ties as localized exchange to examine their operation in private business and function in marketization. The starting assumption is that patron–client exchange is also a type of market transaction: although expressed in popularly legitimated sentiments of social trust, goods and services are voluntarily exchanged.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Price, Authority, and Trust: From Ideal Types to Plural Forms
Bradach, J. L., & Eccles, R. G. (1989) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.15.080189.000525 · Cited by 1,990
Cited by
An institutional view of China's venture capital industry
Bruton, G. D., & Ahlstrom, D. (2003) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(02)00079-4 · Cited by 543
The role of informal institutions in corporate governance: Brazil, Russia, India, and China compared
Estrin, S., & Prevezer, M. (2011) · Asia Pacific Journal of Management · doi:10.1007/s10490-010-9229-1 · Cited by 408
DiMaggio, P., Braithwaite, V., & Levi, M. (1999) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2655590 · Cited by 377
A variety of capitalism … with Chinese characteristics?
Peck, J., & Zhang, J. (2013) · Journal of Economic Geography · doi:10.1093/jeg/lbs058 · Cited by 356
Guanxi as Social Exchange: Emotions, Power and Corruption
Barbalet, J. (2018) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038517692511 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Wank, D. L.
- Venue
- The China Quarterly
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 147
- Pages
- 820-838
- ISSN
- 0009-4439 (ISSN-L)
- 0305-7410
- 1468-2648
- OpenAlex
- W2042788553
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Institutional Process of Market Clientelism: Guanxi and Private Business in a South China City. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s030574100005181x
- The paper
- Wank, D. L. (1996). The Institutional Process of Market Clientelism: Guanxi and Private Business in a South China City. The China Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1017/s030574100005181x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.