Cited by 112Family Dynamics and RelationshipsGender and Feminist StudiesIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving

The Gender of Communication: Changing Expectations of Mothers and Daughters in Urban China

Evans, Harriet·2010·The China Quarterly

Abstract

In the flow of the material, cultural and moral influences shaping contemporary Chinese society, individual desires for emotional communication are reconstituting the meaning of the subject, self and responsibility. This article draws on fieldwork conducted in Beijing between 2000 and 2004 to discuss the gendered dimensions of this process through an analysis of the implications of the “communicative intimacy” sought by mothers and daughters in their mutual relationship. What could be termed a “feminization of intimacy” is the effect of two distinct but linked processes: on the one hand, a market-supported naturalization of women's roles, and on the other, the changing subjective articulation of women's needs, desires and expectations of family and personal relationships. I argue that across these two processes, the celebration of a communicative intimacy does not signify the emergence of more equal family or gender relationships, as recent theories about the individualization and cultural democratization of daily life in Western societies have argued. As families and kin groups, communities and neighbourhoods are physically, spatially and socially broken up, and as gender differences in employment and income increase, media and “expert” encouragement to mothers to become the all-round confidantes, educators and moral guides of their children affirms women's responsibilities in the domestic sphere. Expectations of mother–daughter communication reshape the meaning – and experi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0305741010001050

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A shift in Chinese societal values towards individualism and softening of filial piety norms can make young women unwilling to accept grandmothers' interventions.

    “At the same time, a shift in Chinese societal values towards a greater embrace of individualism and the softening of filial piety norms can make young women unwilling to accept such interventions (Du, 2013;Evans, 2010;Ji et al., 2020;Yan, 2018).”

Authors
Evans, H.
Affiliations
University of Westminster (GB)
Corresponding author
Evans, Harriet
Venue
The China Quarterly
Published
2010-12
Volume
204
Pages
980-1000
ISSN
  • 0009-4439 (ISSN-L)
  • 0305-7410
  • 1468-2648
OpenAlex
W1976928348
Cited by
112
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The China Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Keywords
mother-daughter relationships, gendered communication, urban households, women's domestic roles, individualization, democratization of culture, gender inequality, female subjectivity, Beijing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review