Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modelling the spread of grass fires

Open access
Anderson, D. H., Catchpole, E. A., De Mestre, N. J., Parkes, T.·1982·The Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society. Series B. Applied Mathematics

Abstract

A simple elliptic model is developed for the spread of a fire front through grassland. This is used to predict theoretical fire fronts, which agree closely with those obtained in practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0334270000000394

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Anderson, D. H., Catchpole, E. A., De Mestre, N. J., & Parkes, T.
Venue
The Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society. Series B. Applied Mathematics
Published
1982-04
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
451-466
ISSN
  • 0334-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1839-4078
OpenAlex
W2164669728
Cited by
193
References
1
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modelling the spread of grass fires. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0334270000000394
The paper
Anderson, D. H., Catchpole, E. A., De Mestre, N. J., & Parkes, T. (1982). Modelling the spread of grass fires. The Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society. Series B. Applied Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0334270000000394

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.