Cited by 2,247Fire effects on ecosystemsFire dynamics and safety researchCombustion and flame dynamics

A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels

Rothermel, Richard C.·1972

Abstract

Describes the model and laboratory experiments with three sizes of fuel (wood wool, and 1/4 and 1/2-in sticks) to evaluate empirical parameters for various fuel characteristics; effects of wind velocity and slope are also incorporated. Hypothetical models for use in the National Fire-Danger Rating System [see FA 34, 1705] were developed from the original model (intended for dead fuels) to represent 11 fuel types in temperate regions of the USA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2737/int-rp-115

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Modelling fire behaviour began with the work of Rothermel (1972) and Van Wagner (1973) and has improved over time, including coupling with dynamic vegetation and/or Earth System models spanning a wide range of spatial and temporal scales.

    “Modelling fire behaviour began with the work of (Rothermel, 1972) and (Van Wagner, 1973) and has improved over time (Table S2), including coupling with dynamic vegetation and/or Earth System models spanning a wide range of spatial and temporal scales.”

    From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Rothermel, 1972

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rothermel, R. C.
Affiliations
US Forest Service (US)
Corresponding author
Rothermel, Richard C.
Published
1972
OpenAlex
W37217007
Cited by
2,247
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 105 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 99 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 91 · 2014: 117 · 2013: 114 · 2012: 109
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Fire dynamics and safety research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Combustion and flame dynamics
Keywords
fire spread prediction, wildland fuels, mathematical model, wood wool, wind speed effects, slope effects, empirical parameters, National Fire Danger Rating System, dead fuel, fuel type, temperate regions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review