Cited by 81Chinese history and philosophyDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningHistorical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies

Han Thanatology and the Division of “Souls”

Brashier, K.E.·1996·Early China

Abstract

Modern scholarship has repeatedly maintained that the separation of the hun and po souls at death was a popular Han belief, but a re-examination of the received literature suggests that hunpo dualism was at best only a scholastic model. Sources ranging from the Zuo zhuan to Han medical texts depict the hunpo as an inherent part of the properly functioning body complex, and any deficiency in the hunpo did not necessarily result in death but in distress and disease. Grave stele texts, which also never distinguish between a hun and a po suggest a different dualism—that between the hun or po with its corporeal associations on the one hand and the more rarefied shen on the other. This dualism may have found a practical expression in ancestral worship because the hunpo and body were generally confined to the cemetery but the mobile shen enjoyed its sacrifices at the lineage shrine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0362502800003424

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A classic article by Kenneth Brashier (1996) has called this neat dichotomy into question, demonstrating that there were multiple other scholarly and popular conceptions in which hunpo was used as a compound, or the two terms were used interchangeably.

    “A classic article by Kenneth Brashier (1996) has called this neat dichotomy into question, demonstrating that, although there is considerable evidence for a hun-po dualism in the elite literati tradition, there were multiple other scholarly and popular conceptions in which hunpo was used as a compound, or the two terms were used interchangeably.”

    From Body and Mind in Early China: An Integrated Humanities–Science Approach (2013) · cites this paper as Brashier 1996

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Brashier, K. E.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Brashier, K.E.
Venue
Early China
Published
1996
Volume
21
Pages
125-158
ISSN
  • 0362-5028 (ISSN-L)
  • 2325-2324
OpenAlex
W2207223890
Cited by
81
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 20 · 2019: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Early China (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
Keywords
Han dynasty, shen, Zuo Zhuan, grave stele, ancestor veneration, afterlife beliefs, Chinese cosmology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review