Cited by 38Chinese history and philosophyClassical Studies and PhilologyIndian and Buddhist Studies

Later Han Stone Inscriptions

Ebrey, Patricia·1980·Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2718987

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Long before the appearance of genealogical steles, the ancestral graveyard had been a focal point for the formation and tightening of agnatic kinship relations.

    “Long before the appearance of genealogical steles, the ancestral graveyard had been a focal point for the formation and tightening of agnatic kinship relations.”

    From GENEALOGICAL STELES IN NORTH CHINA DURING THE JIN AND YUAN DYNASTIES (2016) · cites this paper as Ebrey 1980

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ebrey, P.
Corresponding author
Ebrey, Patricia
Venue
Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1980-12
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
325
ISSN
0073-0548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2801495695
Cited by
37
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
Keywords
Later Han dynasty, stone inscriptions, epigraphy, Chinese inscriptions, Han dynasty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review