The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Local Communities and Protected Areas: Attitudes of Rural Residents Towards Conservation and Machalilla National Park, Ecuador
Abstract
Economic and social problems facing many developing countries jeopardize the effectiveness and very existence of their national parks and protected areas. Rural poverty exacerbates the need for access to natural resources in protected areas and increases public conflict with protected-area management. A prerequisite for the long-term sustainability of parks and protected areas is public involvement and support for the conservation of natural resources. Towards the above ends, the present study analyses local residents' attitudes, knowledge, and concept of values concerning conservation and the management of natural resources in Machalilla National Park, Ecuador. A survey was administered of 90 households in three villages located within the Park boundaries and two villages adjacent to the Park. Survey results indicated that local residents living either within or adjacent to Machalilla National Park hold a variety of negative attitudes towards the Park. Positive attitudes tended to increase with respondents' level of education (X 2 = 19.001, df = 2, p < 0.0001) and knowledge about conservation issues (X 2 = 26.616, df = 1, p < 0.0001). Younger residents (X 2 = 12.960, df = 2, p = 0.002), respondents perceiving benefits from the Park (X 2 = 14.292, df = 2, p = 0.001), and respondents reporting good relations with the Park staff (X 2 = 5.514, df = 1, p = 0.019), were more positive towards the Park. Factors influencing public attitudes are compared with study results in other countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Archabald, K., & Naughton-Treves, L. (2001) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892901000145 · Cited by 284
Pfaff, A., Robalino, J., Lima, E., Sandoval, C., & Herrera, L. D. (2014) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.011 · Cited by 263
Human well-being impacts of terrestrial protected areas
Pullin, A. S., Bangpan, M., Dalrymple, S., Dickson, K., Haddaway, N. R., Healey, J. R., Hauari, H., Hockley, N., Jones, J. P. G., Knight, T., et al. (2013) · Environmental Evidence · doi:10.1186/2047-2382-2-19 · Cited by 228
Metadata
- Authors
- Fiallo, E. A., & Jacobson, S. K.
- Venue
- Environmental Conservation
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 241-249
- ISSN
- 0376-8929 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-4387
- OpenAlex
- W2055595432
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Local Communities and Protected Areas: Attitudes of Rural Residents Towards Conservation and Machalilla National Park, Ecuador. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s037689290001064x
- The paper
- Fiallo, E. A., & Jacobson, S. K. (1995). Local Communities and Protected Areas: Attitudes of Rural Residents Towards Conservation and Machalilla National Park, Ecuador. Environmental Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1017/s037689290001064x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.