Cited by 55Wildlife Ecology and ConservationConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementSocioeconomics of Resources and Conservation

Economic impacts of livestock depredation by snow leopard Uncia uncia in the Kanchenjunga Conservation Area, Nepal Himalaya

IKEDA, NAHO·2004·Environmental Conservation

Abstract

It is necessary to fully understand the economic conditions of local herders in order to find solutions to the conflicts between wildlife conservation and livestock rearing in remote areas of low-income countries. In the Kanchenjunga Conservation Area (KCA), Nepal, livestock depredation by snow leopards impacts on yak herders' livelihoods. Retaliatory killings of snow leopard by the herders have been reported and the concerned authorities recently initiated snow leopard conservation programmes. In 2001, interviews with the yak herders who used the pastures in the Ghunsa valley in the preceding year collected data on the incidence of livestock death caused by snow leopards. The annual net cash income of the yak herders was estimated by obtaining baseline values of sales and expenditure per livestock head through field measurement of dairy products and interviews with a sample of herders. As yet, the average annual damage does not appear to have adversely affected fundamental livelihoods in households with an average herd size (36.6 head). However, in the worst scenario of livestock depredation, households with medium or small-sized herds (<40 head) might risk their living conditions becoming unsustainable or having to withdraw from yak pastoralism. A supplementary interview showed that the majority of the herders, except those who took completely neutral attitudes towards the regional conservation and development programme, had negative views of the snow leopard conservation policy. For the snow leopard conservation programme in the KCA to be a success, there must be a system to compensate the herders' households for livestock damage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0376892904001778

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The snow leopard preys on domestic yaks in limited areas, notably Mongolia and Nepal.

    “The snow leopard (Uncia uncia) preys on domestic yaks in limited areas, notably Mongolia and Nepal (Ikeda 2004;Namgail et al. 2007;Oli 1994;Oli et al. 1993;Schaller 1998).”

    From Bos grunniens and Bos mutus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2009) · cites this paper as Ikeda 2004

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
IKEDA, N.
Affiliations
Hokkaido University (JP)
Corresponding author
IKEDA, NAHO
Venue
Environmental Conservation
Published
2004-12
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
322-330
ISSN
  • 0376-8929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-4387
OpenAlex
W2000671181
Cited by
55
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Environmental Conservation (publishedVersion)
Funders
World Wildlife Fund
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Socioeconomics of Resources and Conservation
Keywords
snow leopard, livestock depredation, livelihoods, human-wildlife conflict, wildlife conservation, retaliatory killing, pastoralism, household income

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review