The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sustainability science: a review, an analysis and some empirical lessons
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: Sustainability science has developed from a new research field into a vibrant discipline in its own right, with scientific conferences, journals and scientific societies dedicated to its pursuit. Characterized more by its research purpose than by a common set of methods or objects, sustainability science can be subdivided into the more traditional disciplinary-based science for sustainability and the transdisciplinary science of sustainability. Whereas the former consists of more descriptive, analytical and basic science, the latter is characterized by reflexivity and applicability; on a meta level, the emergence of the latter can be understood as a new step in the evolution of science. This review provides an overview of the state of sustainability science, identifying action orientation, integrated assessments and interdisciplinarity as overall characteristics. The review also focuses on methodological issues, highlighting differences in project organization and management, and the ways in which stakeholder participation can be organized in interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research projects. Sustainability science is recognized as essential for progress towards sustainability, and as an opportunity to bring science closer to the people, requiring significant changes in the way science is organized and conducted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387253a0 · Cited by 22,585
Brundtland, G. H. (1991) · Earth and Us · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-1049-0.50009-5 · Cited by 12,174
Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability
Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., van der Linden, P., & Hanson, C. (2007) · Centre for Environmental Data Analysis Digital Repository (Centre for Environmental Data Analysis) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7356334 · Cited by 9,136
THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS
MCGUIRE, J. E. (1963) · Philosophical Books · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0149.1963.tb00813.x · Cited by 8,424
Science for the post-normal age
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993) · Futures · doi:10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-l · Cited by 4,255
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-0288 · Cited by 3,703
Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty
Linder, F., Spear, J., Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2003) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/3089636 · Cited by 3,381
Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress
Fitoussi, J., Sen, A. K., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2011) · Cited by 2,887
Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., Hall, J. M., Jaeger, C. C., Lowe, I., McCarthy, J. J., Schellnhuber, H. J., Bolin, B., Dickson, N. M., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1059386 · Cited by 2,551
Cited by
Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges
Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., Swilling, M., & Thomas, C. J. (2012) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x · Cited by 2,925
Trencher, G., Yarime, M., McCormick, K. B., Doll, C. N. H., & Kraines, S. B. (2014) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/sct044 · Cited by 656
Accounting and sustainable development: An exploration
Bebbington, J., & Larrinaga, C. (2014) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2014.01.003 · Cited by 622
Popa, F., Guillermin, M., & Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2015) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2014.02.002 · Cited by 434
Yarime, M., Trencher, G., Mino, T., Scholz, R. W., Olsson, L., Ness, B., Frantzeskaki, N., & Rotmans, J. (2012) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-012-0157-5 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- SPANGENBERG, J. H.
- Venue
- Environmental Conservation
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2011-06-14
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 275-287
- ISSN
- 0376-8929 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-4387
- OpenAlex
- W2129686587
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 47.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sustainability science: a review, an analysis and some empirical lessons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0376892911000270
- The paper
- SPANGENBERG, J. H. (2011). Sustainability science: a review, an analysis and some empirical lessons. Environmental Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892911000270
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
