The DOI matches its Crossref record; 128 of the 128 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Knowledge exchange: a review and research agenda for environmental management
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: There is increasing emphasis on the need for effective ways of sharing knowledge to enhance environmental management and sustainability. Knowledge exchange (KE) are processes that generate, share and/or use knowledge through various methods appropriate to the context, purpose, and participants involved. KE includes concepts such as sharing, generation, coproduction, comanagement, and brokerage of knowledge. This paper elicits the expert knowledge of academics involved in research and practice of KE from different disciplines and backgrounds to review research themes, identify gaps and questions, and develop a research agenda for furthering understanding about KE. Results include 80 research questions prefaced by a review of research themes. Key conclusions are: (1) there is a diverse range of questions relating to KE that require attention; (2) there is a particular need for research on understanding the process of KE and how KE can be evaluated; and (3) given the strong interdependency of research questions, an integrated approach to understanding KE is required. To improve understanding of KE, action research methodologies and embedding evaluation as a normal part of KE research and practice need to be encouraged. This will foster more adaptive approaches to learning about KE and enhance effectiveness of environmental management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,322
(1980) · Cited by 22,286
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001 · Cited by 20,632
(1999) · Cited by 12,812
Risk Society, Towards a New Modernity
Leiss, W., Beck, U., Ritter, M., Lash, S., & Wynne, B. (1994) · Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie · doi:10.2307/3341155 · Cited by 12,546
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956) · Cited by 9,342
Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity
Boyd, W., Beck, U., & Shrader-Frechette, K. S. (1993) · Economic Geography · doi:10.2307/143601 · Cited by 9,215
Systems Thinking, Systems Practice
Checkland, P. B. (1981) · Cumulative Index of Computer Aided Architectural Design · Cited by 6,256
Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map?
Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Harrison, M. B., Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., & Robinson, N. (2006) · Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions · doi:10.1002/chp.47 · Cited by 4,705
(1956) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,596
Cited by
A How‐to Guide for Coproduction of Actionable Science
Beier, P., Hansen, L. J., Helbrecht, L., & Behar, D. (2017) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/conl.12300 · Cited by 408
Cvitanovic, C., McDonald, J., & Hobday, A. J. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.038 · Cited by 361
Dynamics and Resilience of Rangelands and Pastoral Peoples Around the Globe
Reid, R. S., Fernández-Giménez, M. E., & Galvin, K. A. (2014) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-020713-163329 · Cited by 332
Bridging knowledge systems to enhance governance of environmental commons: A typology of settings
Rathwell, K. J., Armitage, D., & Berkes, F. (2015) · International Journal of the Commons · doi:10.18352/ijc.584 · Cited by 154
Arctic air pollution: Challenges and opportunities for the next decade
Arnold, S. R., Law, K. S., Brock, C. A., Thomas, J. L., Starkweather, S. M., von Salzen, K., Stohl, A., Sharma, S., Lund, M. T., Flanner, M. G., et al. (2016) · Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene · doi:10.12952/journal.elementa.000104 · Cited by 131
“Such practices, including the development of small user friendly sensors, require carefully developed knowledge exchange frameworks to bridge differences between communities of practice (Fazey et al., 2013).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- FAZEY, I., EVELY, A. C., REED, M. S., STRINGER, L. C., KRUIJSEN, J., WHITE, P. C. L., NEWSHAM, A., JIN, L., CORTAZZI, M., PHILLIPSON, J., BLACKSTOCK, K., ENTWISTLE, N., SHEATE, W., ARMSTRONG, F., BLACKMORE, C., FAZEY, J., INGRAM, J., GREGSON, J., LOWE, P., MORTON, S., & TREVITT, C.
- Venue
- Environmental Conservation
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2012-09-24
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-36
- ISSN
- 0376-8929 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-4387
- OpenAlex
- W2152185999
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 128
- FWCI
- 46.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Knowledge exchange: a review and research agenda for environmental management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s037689291200029x
- The paper
- FAZEY, I., EVELY, A. C., REED, M. S., STRINGER, L. C., KRUIJSEN, J., WHITE, P. C. L., NEWSHAM, A., JIN, L., CORTAZZI, M., PHILLIPSON, J., BLACKSTOCK, K., ENTWISTLE, N., SHEATE, W., ARMSTRONG, F., BLACKMORE, C., FAZEY, J., INGRAM, J., GREGSON, J., LOWE, P., . . . TREVITT, C. (2013). Knowledge exchange: a review and research agenda for environmental management. Environmental Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1017/s037689291200029x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
