The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The ecosystem service of sense of place: benefits for human well-being and biodiversity conservation
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: Assessing the cultural benefits provided by non-market ecosystem services can contribute previously unknown information to supplement conservation decision-making. The concept of sense of place embeds all dimensions of peoples’ perceptions and interpretations of the environment, such as attachment, identity or symbolic meaning, and has the potential to link social and ecological issues. This review contains: (1) an evaluation of the importance of sense of place as an ecosystem service; and (2) comprehensive discussion as to how incorporating sense of place in an evaluation can uncover potential benefits for both biodiversity conservation and human well-being. Sense of place provides physical and psychological benefits to people, and has neglected economic value. The biodiversity-related experiences are essential components of the service that need to be further explored. A conceptual framework was used to explore how the existing knowledge on sense of place derived from other fields can be used to inform conservation decision-making, but further research is needed to fill existing gaps in knowledge. This review contributes to a better understanding of the role biodiversity plays in human well-being, and should inform the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global Consequences of Land Use
Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., Coe, M. T., Daily, G. C., Gibbs, H. K., et al. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1111772 · Cited by 13,272
Solutions for a cultivated planet
Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K. A., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., Mueller, N. D., O’Connell, C., Ray, D. K., West, P. C., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10452 · Cited by 8,476
Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity
Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D. U., Perrings, C., Venail, P., Narwani, A., Mace, G. M., Tilman, D., Wardle, D. A., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11148 · Cited by 7,457 · cited 3×
“…functioning and stability, the flow of ecosystem ∗Correspondence: Anna Hausmann Tel: +27 72 1713245 e-mail: anna.hausmann87@gmail.com Supplementary material can be found online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0376892915000314 services and human well-being (Foley et al. 2005; Cardinale et al. 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialScience for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
Carpenter, S. R., Mooney, H. A., Agard, J., Capistrano, D., DeFries, R. S., Díaz, S., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A. K., Oteng-Yeboah, A., Pereira, H. M., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0808772106 · Cited by 2,257
Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment
Ulrich, R. S. (1983) · Behavior and the Natural Environment · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9_4 · Cited by 2,241
Social Capital and the Environment
Pretty, J., & Ward, H. (2001) · World Development · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(00)00098-x · Cited by 1,764
Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity.
Fuller, R. A., Irvine, K. N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P. H., & Gaston, K. J. (2007) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0149 · Cited by 1,549
Bringing Ecosystem Services into Economic Decision-Making: Land Use in the United Kingdom
Bateman, I. J., Harwood, A. R., Mace, G. M., Watson, R. T., Abson, D. J., Andrews, B., Binner, A., Crowe, A., Day, B. H., Dugdale, S., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1234379 · Cited by 1,031
An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development
Tallis, H., Kareiva, P., Marvier, M., & Chang, A. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0705797105 · Cited by 753
Landscape and well-being: A scoping study on the health-promoting impact of outdoor environments
Abraham, A., Sommerhalder, K., & Abel, T. (2010) · International Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1007/s00038-009-0069-z · Cited by 527 · cited 2×
“Health benefits Contact with nature promotes physical, mental and psychological well-being, enhancing peoples’ assessment of quality of life in ways that cannot be satisfied by alternative means (Abraham et al. 2010; Maller et al. 2006; Russell et al. 2013).”
Background
Cited by
A systematic review of cultural ecosystem services and human wellbeing
Kosanic, A., & Petzold, J. (2020) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101168 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- HAUSMANN, A., SLOTOW, R., BURNS, J. K., & DI MININ, E.
- Venue
- Environmental Conservation
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2015-09-16
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 117-127
- ISSN
- 0376-8929 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-4387
- OpenAlex
- W2281461032
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 9.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The ecosystem service of sense of place: benefits for human well-being and biodiversity conservation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0376892915000314
- The paper
- HAUSMANN, A., SLOTOW, R., BURNS, J. K., & DI MININ, E. (2016). The ecosystem service of sense of place: benefits for human well-being and biodiversity conservation. Environmental Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892915000314
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
