Cited by 44Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Making care decisions in home-based dementia care: why context matters

Open access
St-Amant, Oona, Ward-Griffin, Catherine, DeForge, Ryan T., Oudshoorn, Abe, McWilliam, Carol, Forbes, Dorothy, Kloseck, Marita, Hall, Jodi·2012·Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement

Abstract

RÉSUMÉ D’ici à 2038, le nombre d’heures de soins non rémunérées aux aînés offert par les membres de la famille devraient tripler. Les membres des familles sont souvent suppliés d’aider dans le processus parce que vivre avec la démence peut inhiber la capacité pour prendre une décision. Cette étude ethnographique a soumis les relations au sein de soins de la démence à domicile à un examen critique par le biais des entrevues face-à-face et les observations des participants des clients, des aidants naturels et des prestataires de soins à domicile. Les résultats ont révélé comment les décisions sont imposées dans le contexte du système de soins à domicile formels, et ont mis en évidence trois thèmes: (1) L’accommodation de la compétence/incompétence, comme définie cliniquement; (2) La prise de décisions inopportunes; et (3) Le renforcement de l’exclusion des déments dans la prise de décision. Ces thèmes illuminent la façon dont les valeurs culturelles (la compétence), les croyances (l’immuabilité du système) et les pratiques (le réglage des décisions) dans le système de soins à domicile sont finalement déterministes dans la prise de décisions pour les déments et leurs aidants. Afin d’optimiser la santé des déments qui se font soignés à domicile, il faut accorder d’attention supplémentaire aux pratiques collaboratives et inclusives des membres des familles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0714980812000396

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Home care case managers tend to pay more attention to the lack of available resources or system pressures when making care decisions, while family caregivers consider the relational effects that decisions would have on the family unit.

    “For example, home care case managers tend to pay more attention to the lack of available resources or system pressures when making care decisions while family caregivers consider the relational effects that decisions would have on the family unit [50].”
  • The tension between what is considered essential and valued in quality home care, such as personalized and flexible care, is at odds with constraints imposed by the existing home care system.

    “The tension between what is considered essential and valued in quality home care, like personalized and flexible care, is at odds with constraints imposed by the existing home care system [49,50].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
St-Amant, O., Ward-Griffin, C., DeForge, R. T., Oudshoorn, A., McWilliam, C., Forbes, D., Kloseck, M., & Hall, J.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
St-Amant, Oona
Venue
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement
Published
2012-12
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
423-434
ISSN
  • 0714-9808 (ISSN-L)
  • 1710-1107
OpenAlex
W2158012184
Cited by
44
References
59
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
  • ERA: Education and Research Archive (University of Alberta)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
dementia care, home care, care decision-making, family caregivers, natural caregivers, competency assessment, caregiver-family relationship
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Decision Making, Dementia, Female, Home Nursing, Humans, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review