Cited by 30Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionAging and Gerontology ResearchDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

Older Adults and the Fear of Death: The Protective Function of Generativity

Open access
Major, Rochelle J., Whelton, William J., Schimel, Jeff, Sharpe, Donald·2016·Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement

Abstract

RÉSUMÉ La théorie de la gestion de terreur (TGT) indique que les visions du monde culturel apaisent les inquiétudes au sujet de la mortalité humaine. Des recherches préliminaires avec des personnes âgées ont indiqué que les personnes âgées ne répondent pas aux rappels de la mort de la même manière que leurs plus jeunes homologues. Le but de l’étude était de tester un concept de développement pertinent qui peut fonctionner comme un tampon contre l’anxiété ressenti à la mort à la fin de vie. L’hypothèse est que le concept de générativité d’ Erikson peut comprendre des propriétés niant de la mort pour les personnes âgées. Cent soixante-dix-neuf personnes âgées ont été recrutés pour déterminer si les initiations* subtiles mais saillants de la mortalité conduirait les participants à évaluer leur propre générativité comme étant plus élevé qu’après les initiations flagrantes, ou pas du tout, après contrôle de la générativité avant l’initiation. Comme prévu, les participants exposés à subtile renforcements de la mort se sont considérés comme ayant des niveaux plus élevés de la générativité que les deux autres groupes après générativité covariable avant. Les explications sont discutées à la lumière de la littérature sur la TGT et la générativité.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0714980816000143

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An early replication failure resulted in a refining of methods wherein MS tasks that are intense, blatant, or rational can impede the desired effects compared to experiential and/or subtle primes.

    “For example, an early replication failure noted by Ochsman and colleagues [cited in 27] resulted in a refining of methods wherein MS tasks that are intense, blatant, or rational can impede the desired effects compared to experiential and/or subtle primes [54, 55].”

    From Not so terrifying after all? A set of failed replications of the mortality salience effects of Terror Management Theory (2023) · cites this paper as [55]

    The Generativity results (page unavailable) report higher generativity after a subtle mortality-salience prime than after a blatant prime or control condition in older adults. The paper does not establish that intense or rational tasks impede effects, compare them with experiential primes, or document the claimed methodological refinement. The early replication failure is separately attributed to citation [27]. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Becker , E . ( 1973 ). The denial of death . New York, NY : The Free Press .
  2. Heath , C. W . ( 1945 ). What people are . Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
  3. Lifton , R. J . ( 1974 ). The sense of immortality: On death and the continuity of life . In R. J. Lifton (Ed.), Explorations in psychohistory (pp. 275 -276 ). New York, NY : Simon & Schuster .
  4. P311 Markides , K. S . ( 1983 ). Aging, religiosity, and adjustment . Journal of Gerontology , 38 , 621 -625 .
  5. Solomon , S. , Greenberg , J. , & Pyszczynski , T . ( 2004 ). The cul- tural animal: Twenty years of terror management theory and research . In J. Greenberg , S. L. Koole , & T. Pyszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 13 -34 ). New York, NY : Guilford Press .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Major, R. J., Whelton, W. J., Schimel, J., & Sharpe, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of Regina (CA)
Corresponding author
Major, Rochelle J.
Venue
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement
Published
2016-04-27
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
261-272
ISSN
  • 0714-9808 (ISSN-L)
  • 1710-1107
OpenAlex
W2343454184
Cited by
30
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
5.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
fear of death, generativity, Erik Erikson, terror management theory, older adults, mortality salience, end-of-life anxiety, death denial
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Anxiety, Attitude to Death, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review