The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bacterial solubilization of mineral phosphates: Historical perspective and future prospects
Abstract
Maximum crop yields require sufficient phosphorus fertilization. Only phosphate in a soluble ionic form (Pi) is effective as a mineral nutrient. Current fertilizer technology supplies the soil solution with Pi via the application of large amounts of phosphate salts. Problems with this technology include energy-intensive production processes, the need for large scale mechanical application with associated environmental consequences, and reprecipitation of the phosphate into insoluble mineral complexes. It has been estimated that in some soils up to 75% of applied phosphate fertilizer may be lost to the plant because of mineral phase reprecipitation. Many approaches, ranging from cultural practices to biological inoculants such as mycorrhizal fungi, are being employed to enhance P-use efficiency. One area that is currently under-investigated is the ability of certain types of bacteria to solubilize mineral and organic phosphates. A review of the literature in the area of bacterial phosphate solubilization confirms that this trait is displayed by a wide range of bacteria. The phosphate starvation inducible (PSI) organic phosphate-solubilizing capability of E. coli is a component of a coordinately regulated gene system: the pho regulon. It has long been known that bacteria are also capable of solubilizing mineral phosphates such as hydroxyapatite. To date there has been no systematic study of the genetics of this phenomenon. Data from my laboratory indicate that the bacterial mineral phosphate-solubilizing (MPS) trait is regulated by the external level of Pi This conclusion is supported by results obtained from several types of molecular genetic studies. It is proposed that bacteria have mineral phosphate solubilizing (mps) genes. The potential agronomic applications of bacterial mineral and organic P solubilizing systems are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion
Rodrı́guez, H., & Fraga, R. (1999) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/s0734-9750(99)00014-2 · Cited by 3,043
Soil beneficial bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion: a review
Hayat, R., Ali, S., Amara, U., Khalid, R., & Ahmed, I. (2010) · Annals of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s13213-010-0117-1 · Cited by 2,064
Chen, Y. P., Rekha, P. D., Arun, A. B., Shen, F. T., Lai, W.-A., & Young, C. C. (2006) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.12.002 · Cited by 1,438
Growth Promotion of Plants Inoculated with Phosphate-Solubilizing Fungi
Whitelaw, M. A. (1999) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(08)60948-7 · Cited by 710
Verma, S. (2001) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1656(01)00333-9 · Cited by 506
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldstein, A. H.
- Venue
- American Journal of Alternative Agriculture
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1986
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 51-57
- ISSN
- 0889-1893 (ISSN-L)
- 1478-5498
- OpenAlex
- W2128389435
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial solubilization of mineral phosphates: Historical perspective and future prospects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0889189300000886
- The paper
- Goldstein, A. H. (1986). Bacterial solubilization of mineral phosphates: Historical perspective and future prospects. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0889189300000886
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.