Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 392

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Soil quality: Attributes and relationship to alternative and sustainable agriculture

Parr, J.F., Papendick, R.I., Hornick, S.B., Meyer, R.E.·1992·American Journal of Alternative Agriculture

Abstract

Different chemical, physical, and biological properties of a soil interact in complex ways that determine its potential fitness or capacity to produce healthy and nutritious crops. The integration of these properties andine resulting level of productivity often is referred to as “soil quality.” Soil quality can be defined as an inherent attribute of a soil that is inferred from its specific characteristics and observations (e.g., compactability, erodibility, and fertility). The term also refers to the soil's structural integrity, which imparts resistance to erosion, and to the loss of plant nutrients and organic matter. Soil quality often is related to soil degradation, which can be defined as the time rate of change in soil quality. Soil quality should not be limited to soil productivity, but should encompass environmental quality, human and animal health, and food safety and quality. There is inadequate reliable information on how changes in soil quality directly affect food quality, or indirectly affect human and animal health. In characterizing soil quality, biological properties have received less emphasis than chemical and physical properties, because their effects are difficult to measure, predict, or quantify. Improved soil quality often is indicated by increased infiltration, aeration, macropores, aggregate size, aggregate stability, and soil organic matter, and by decreased bulk density, soil resistance, erosion, and nutrient runoff. These are useful, but future research should seek to identify and quantify reliable and meaningful biological/ecological indicators of soil quality, such as total species diversity or genetic diversity of beneficial soil microorganisms, insects, and animals. Because these biological/ecological indexes of soil quality are dynamic, they will require effective monitoring and assessment programs to develop appropriate databases for research and technology transfer. We need to know how such indexes are affected by management inputs, whether they can serve as early warning indicators of soil degradation, and how they relate to the sustainability of agricultural systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0889189300004367

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 10.1017/S0889189300002514 · doi:10.1017/s0889189300002514
  2. Storie, 1976, Storie index rating
  3. 10.1017/S0889189300004446 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 1984, Glossary of Soil Science Terms
  5. 10.1007/978-1-4757-1915-4_11 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1126/science.225.4666.989 · DOI
  7. 10.1017/S0889189300004434 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 34. U.S. Congress. 1990. Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990, pp. 3705–3706. Public Law 101–624. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
  9. Larson, 1990, Research Issues in Soil Erosion/Productivity—Executive Summary
  10. 10.1017/S0889189300004392 · DOI
  11. Dregne, 1992, Erosion and soil productivity in Asia, J. Soil and Water Conservation, 47, 8
  12. 10.1017/S0889189300001594 · doi:10.1017/s0889189300001594
  13. Allison, 1973, Soil Organic Matter and its Role in Crop Production
  14. Langdale, 1979, Corn yield reduction on eroded Southern Piedmont soils, J. Soil and Water Conservation, 34, 226
  15. 10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400060035x · doi:10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400060035x
  16. Papendick, 1985, Soil Erosion and Crop Productivity, 305
  17. Gomey, 1986, Scientific Basis for Soil Protection in the European Community
  18. Gibbons, 1984, Do we treat our soil like dirt?, National Geographic, 166, 350
  19. 1991, Proceedings of a Workshop on Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education in the Field
  20. Granatstein, 1990, Management Strategies for a Sustainable Cereal Cropping System
  21. 1989, Alternative Agriculture
  22. 10.2307/1942531 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Oldeman, 1990, World map on the status of human-induced soil degradation, at an average scale of 1:10 million
  24. Parr, 1990, Improving the sustainability of dryland farming systems: A global perspective, Advances in Soil Sci., 13, 1, 10.1007/978-1-4613-8982-8_1 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-8982-8_1
  25. Schlesinger, 1984, The Role of Terrestrial Vegetation in the Global Carbon Cycle, SCOPE 23:111–127
  26. Pierce, 1983, Productivity of soils: Assessing long term changes due to erosion, J. Soil and Water Conservation, 38, 39
  27. Sampson, 1981, Farmland or Wasteland, 133
  28. Reganold, 1986, The land capability classification system, Northwest Land Use Review, 2, 11
  29. Brown, 1984, Soil Erosion: Quiet Crisis in the World Economy
  30. Haberern, 1992, A soil health index, J. Soil and Water Conservation, 47, 6
  31. Smith, 1990, The significance of soil microbial biomass estimations, Soil Biochemistry, 6, 357
  32. 10.1017/S0889189300004471 · DOI

Cited by

See all 392

Metadata

Authors
Parr, J. F., Papendick, R. I., Hornick, S. B., & Meyer, R. E.
Venue
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture
Published
1992-06
Volume
7
Issue
1-2
Pages
5-11
ISSN
  • 0889-1893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-5498
OpenAlex
W1989865846
Cited by
392
References
0
FWCI
18.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil quality: Attributes and relationship to alternative and sustainable agriculture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0889189300004367
The paper
Parr, J. F., Papendick, R. I., Hornick, S. B., & Meyer, R. E. (1992). Soil quality: Attributes and relationship to alternative and sustainable agriculture. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0889189300004367

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.