Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 14

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Naturalistic color discriminations in polymorphic platyrrhine monkeys: Effects of stimulus luminance and duration examined with functional substitution

ROWE, MICKEY P., JACOBS, GERALD H.·2007·Visual Neuroscience
DOI 10.1017/s0952523807230159
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

X-linked photopigment polymorphism produces six different color vision phenotypes in most species of New World monkey. In the subfamily Callitrichinae, the three M/L alleles underlying these different phenotypes are present at unequal frequencies suggesting that selective pressures other than heterozygous-advantage operate on these alleles. Earlier we investigated this hypothesis with functional substitution, a technique using a computer monitor to simulate colors as they would appear to humans with monkey visual pigments (Visual Neuroscience21:217–222, 2004). The stimuli were derived from measurements of ecologically relevant fruit and foliage. We found that discrimination performance depended on the relative spectral positioning of the substituted M and L pigment pair. Here we have undertaken a systematic examination of two simulation parameters—test field luminance and stimulus duration. Discriminability of the fruit colors depended on which phenotype was simulated but only at short stimulus durations and/or low luminances. Under such conditions, phenotypes with the larger pigment peak separations performed better. At longer durations and higher luminances, differences in performance across different substitutions tended to disappear. The stimuli used in this experiment were analyzed with several color discrimination models. There was limited agreement among the predictions made by these models regarding the capabilities of animals with different pigment pairs and none predicted the dependence of discrimination on changes in luminance and stimulus duration.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0952523807230159

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Sumner, P. & Mollon, J.D. (2003). Did primate trichromacy evolve forfrugivory or folivory? InNormal and Defective Colour Vision, eds. Mollon, J.D. , Pokorny, J. & Knoblauch, K. , pp.21–30.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  2. Wyszecki, G. & Stiles, W.S. (1982). Color Science, Concepts andMethods, Quantitative Data and Formulae, 2nd Edition, New York: JohnWiley & Sons, Inc.

Cited by

See all 14

Metadata

Authors
ROWE, M. P., & JACOBS, G. H.
Venue
Visual Neuroscience
Publisher
Maximum Academic Press
Published
2007-01
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
17-23
ISSN
  • 0952-5238
  • 1469-8714
DOI
10.1017/s0952523807230159
Cited by
14
References
42
Language
en
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 100 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.