The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distribution and morphology of human cone photoreceptors stained with anti‐blue opsin
Abstract
Primate cones maximally sensitive to short wavelength light (blue cones) have been previously identified by using indirect methods. We stained 7 wholemounted human retinas obtained from 6 female donors, using an affinity purified antibody to a 19 amino acid peptide sequence at the N‐terminus of blue opsin (Lerea et al., '89: Neuron 3:367–376), standard PAP immunocytochemistry, and controls. Cones were counted where all outer segments could be traced to inner segments and were measured where cells were well aligned vertically. We find that: (1) 7% of cones within 4 mm of the foveal center are labeled by antiblue opsin; (2) compared to neighboring red/green cones, blue cone inner segments are 10% taller, have a larger cross‐sectional diameter near the junction with the outer segment, and a smaller diameter near the external limiting membrane, resulting in a more cylindrical shape, (3) foveal blue cones are sparse, irregularly spaced, and missing in a zone about 100 μm (0.35°) in diameter near the site of peak cone density, (4) the highest densities of blue cones (> 2,000 cells/mm 2) are found in a ring at 0.1–0.3 mm eccentricity, and (5) the shortest distances between neighboring cones are between blue and red/green cones, and the blue and red/green mosaics are statistically independent. These findings are consistent with psychophysical reports of foveal tritanopia and maximum sensitivity to blue light at 1° eccentricity. Blue cone spacing may limit resolution of the blue channel out to 20–30° eccentricity. The blue and red/green mosaics appear to be formed by separate processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Age-related changes in the central visual field for short-wavelength-sensitive pathways
Johnson, C. A., Adams, A. J., Twelker, J. D., & Quigg, J. M. (1988) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.5.002131 · Cited by 132
Cited by
The mosaic of midget ganglion cells in the human retina
Dacey, D. (1993) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.13-12-05334.1993 · Cited by 480
Organization of the human trichromatic cone mosaic
Hofer, H., Carroll, J., Neitz, J., Neitz, M., & Williams, D. R. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2414-05.2005 · Cited by 364
Horizontal Cells of the Primate Retina: Cone Specificity Without Spectral Opponency
Dacey, D. M., Lee, B. B., Stafford, D. K., Pokorny, J., & Smith, V. C. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.271.5249.656 · Cited by 209
Boye, S. E., Alexander, J. J., Boye, S. L., Witherspoon, C. D., Sandefer, K. J., Conlon, T. J., Erger, K., Sun, J., Ryals, R., Chiodo, V. A., et al. (2012) · Human Gene Therapy · doi:10.1089/hum.2012.125 · Cited by 117
Ultrastructure of the human retina in aging and various pathological states
Nag, T. C., & Wadhwa, S. (2012) · Micron · doi:10.1016/j.micron.2012.01.011 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Curcio, C. A., Allen, K. A., Sloan, K. R., Lerea, C. L., Hurley, J. B., Klock, I. B., & Milam, A. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-10-22
- Volume
- 312
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 610-624
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2003965310
- Cited by
- 629
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distribution and morphology of human cone photoreceptors stained with anti‐blue opsin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.903120411
- The paper
- Curcio, C. A., Allen, K. A., Sloan, K. R., Lerea, C. L., Hurley, J. B., Klock, I. B., & Milam, A. H. (1991). Distribution and morphology of human cone photoreceptors stained with anti‐blue opsin. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903120411
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.