Cited by 249Obesity, Physical Activity, DietCancer Risks and FactorsObesity and Health Practices

A review and meta-analysis of the effect of weight loss on all-cause mortality risk

Open access
Harrington, Mary, Gibson, Sigrid, Cottrell, Richard C.·2009·Nutrition Research Reviews

Abstract

Overweight and obesity are associated with increased morbidity and mortality, although the range of body weights that is optimal for health is controversial. It is less clear whether weight loss benefits longevity and hence whether weight reduction is justified as a prime goal for all individuals who are overweight (normally defined as BMI>25 kg/m 2 ). The purpose of the present review was to examine the evidence base for recommending weight loss by diet and lifestyle change as a means of prolonging life. An electronic search identified twenty-six eligible prospective studies that monitored subsequent mortality risk following weight loss by lifestyle change, published up to 2008. Data were extracted and further analysed by meta-analysis, giving particular attention to the influence of confounders. Moderator variables such as reason for weight loss (intentional, unintentional), baseline health status (healthy, unhealthy), baseline BMI (normal, overweight, obese), method used to estimate weight loss (measured weight loss, reported weight loss) and whether models adjusted for physical activity (adjusted data, unadjusted data) were used to classify subgroups for separate analysis. Intentional weight loss per se had a neutral effect on all-cause mortality (relative risk (RR) 1·01; P = 0·89), while weight loss which was unintentional or ill-defined was associated with excess risk of 22 to 39 %. Intentional weight loss had a small benefit for individuals classified as unhealthy (with obesity-related risk factors) (RR 0·87 (95 % CI 0·77, 0·99); P = 0·028), especially unhealthy obese (RR 0·84 (95 % CI 0·73, 0·97); P = 0·018), but appeared to be associated with slightly increased mortality for healthy individuals (RR 1·11 (95 % CI 1·00, 1·22); P = 0·05), and for those who were overweight but not obese (RR 1·09 (95 % CI 1·02, 1·17); P = 0·008). There was no evidence for weight loss conferring either benefit or risk among healthy obese. In conclusion, the available evidence does not support solely advising overweight or obese individuals who are otherwise healthy to lose weight as a means of prolonging life. Other aspects of a healthy lifestyle, especially exercise and dietary quality, should be considered. However, well-designed intervention studies are needed clearly to disentangle the influence of physical activity, diet strategy and body composition, in order to define appropriate advice to those populations that might be expected to benefit.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0954422409990035

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent meta-analysis of cohort studies concluded that moderate intentional weight loss was associated with reduced mortality in "unhealthy" individuals, which included individuals with diabetes.

    “A recent meta-analysis4 of cohort studies concluded that moderate intentional weight loss was associated with reduced mortality in “unhealthy” individuals, which included individuals with diabetes.”

    From Cardiovascular effects of intensive lifestyle intervention in type 2 diabetes (2013) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Main findings section reports about 13% lower mortality among unhealthy adults, defined to include people with diabetes or obesity-related conditions. The Abstract describes a meta-analysis of prospective studies. However, the reported result concerns intentional weight loss generally; our copy does not establish that the reduction was specific to moderate weight loss. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harrington, M., Gibson, S., & Cottrell, R. C.
Affiliations
World Sugar Research Organisation (GB)
Corresponding author
Cottrell, Richard C.
Venue
Nutrition Research Reviews
Published
2009-06
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
93-108
ISSN
  • 0954-4224 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2700
OpenAlex
W1975604425
Cited by
249
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 14
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrition Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
weight loss, all-cause mortality, obesity, overweight, intentional weight loss, unintentional weight loss, lifestyle intervention, diet, physical activity, body mass index, longevity, healthy lifestyle, diet quality, weight loss interventions, mortality risk reduction, metabolically healthy obesity
MeSH terms
Humans, Life Style, Longevity, Obesity, Weight Loss, Intention, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review