Cited by 597Action Observation and SynchronizationChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

From emotion resonance to empathic understanding: A social developmental neuroscience account

Decety, Jean, Meyer, Meghan·2008·Development and Psychopathology

Abstract

The psychological construct of empathy refers to an intersubjective induction process by which positive and negative emotions are shared, without losing sight of whose feelings belong to whom. Empathy can lead to personal distress or to empathic concern (sympathy). The goal of this paper is to address the underlying cognitive processes and their neural underpinnings that constitute empathy within a developmental neuroscience perspective. In addition, we focus on how these processes go awry in developmental disorders marked by impairments in social cognition, such as autism spectrum disorder, and conduct disorder. We argue that empathy involves both bottom-up and top-down information processing, underpinned by specific and interacting neural systems. We discuss data from developmental psychology as well as cognitive neuroscience in support of such a model, and highlight the impact of neural dysfunctions on social cognitive developmental behavior. Altogether, bridging developmental science and cognitive neuroscience helps approach a more complete understanding of social cognition. Synthesizing these two domains also contributes to a better characterization of developmental psychopathologies that impacts the development of effective treatment strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0954579408000503

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The shared anchor of different definitions of empathy is the matching relation between the emotions of two people.

    “Decety and Meyer [35] also identified that the shared anchor of different definitions of empathy is the matching relation between the emotions of two people.”

    From A Taxonomy of Social Errors in Human-Robot Interaction (2021) · cites this paper as [35]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 218 · Cited by 597

Authors
Decety, J., & Meyer, M.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Venue
Development and Psychopathology
Published
2008
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
1053-1080
ISSN
  • 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2198
OpenAlex
W2163150496
Cited by
597
References
218
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 23
FWCI
31.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Development and Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
empathy, empathic concern, social cognition, autism spectrum disorder, conduct disorder, top-down and bottom-up processing, neural dysfunction, developmental psychopathology, intersubjectivity, treatment options
MeSH terms
Awareness, Mental Disorders, Child, Child Development, Developmental Disabilities, Psychology, Child, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Emotions, Empathy, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Motivation, Neurosciences, Social Behavior, Social Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review