Cited by 199Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild Abuse and TraumaPersonality Traits and Psychology

Differential susceptibility to the environment: Toward an understanding of sensitivity to developmental experiences and context

Open access
Ellis, Bruce J., Boyce, W. Thomas·2011·Development and Psychopathology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s095457941000060x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals carrying specific variants in plasticity genes are more susceptible to environmental factors, regardless of whether those factors are risk-promoting or development-enhancing.

    “Individuals carrying speci fi c variants in these genes are more susceptible to environmental factors, regardless of their risk-promoting or development-enhancing nature”

    From ADHD, CD, and ODD: Systematic review of genetic and environmental risk factors (2018) · cites this paper as Ellis & Boyce, 2011

  • Differential susceptibility theory postulates that children differ in their susceptibility to environmental experiences or qualities, with some more susceptible to both negative and positive conditions.

    “the di ff erential susceptibility theory, postulates that children di ff er in their susceptibility to experiences or qualities of the environment”

    From ADHD, CD, and ODD: Systematic review of genetic and environmental risk factors (2018) · cites this paper as Ellis & Boyce, 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Genetic vul- nerability or differential susceptibility in child development: The case of attachment [Research review]. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychia- try, 48, 1160-1173.
  2. Belsky, J. (2000). Conditional and alternative reproductive strategies: Indi- vidual differences in susceptibility to rearing experience. In J. Rodgers, D. Rowe, & W. Miller (Eds.), Genetic influences on human fertility and sexuality: Theoretical and empirical contributions from the biolog- ical and behavioral sciences (pp. 127-146). Boston: Kluwer.
  3. Belsky, J. (2005). Differential susceptibility to rearing influences: An evolu- tionary hypothesis and some evidence. In B. Ellis & D. Bjorklund (Eds.), Origins of the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and child develop- ment (pp. 139-163). New York: Guilford Press.
  4. Klein Velderman, M., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Juffer, F., & van IJzen- doorn, M. H., (2006). Effects of attachment-based interventions on ma- ternal sensitivity and infant attachment: Differential susceptibility of highly reactive infants. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 266-274.
  5. Morris, S. C. (2010). Evolution: Like any other science it is predictable. Philo- sophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 365, 133-145.
  6. Rowe, D. C. (2000). Environmental and genetic influences on pubertal devel- opment: Evolutionary life history traits? In J. L. Rodgers, D. C Rowe, & W. B. Miller (Eds.), Genetic influences on human fertility and sexuality: Recent empirical and theoretical findings (pp. 147-168). Boston: Kluwer.
  7. Suomi, S. (1997). Early determinants of behaviour. British Medical Bulletin, 53, 170-184.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ellis, B. J., & Boyce, W. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Ellis, Bruce J.
  • Boyce, W. Thomas
Venue
Development and Psychopathology
Published
2011-01-24
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
1-5
ISSN
  • 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2198
OpenAlex
W2166177839
Cited by
199
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 18
FWCI
16.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Development and Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
differential susceptibility theory, developmental experiences, environmental context, developmental plasticity, child development, psychopathology
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Child, Child Behavior, Child Development, Disease Susceptibility, Genotype, Humans, Phenotype, Psychopathology, Social Environment, Temperament, Parenting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review