Cited by 75Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

ADHD, CD, and ODD: Systematic review of genetic and environmental risk factors

Azeredo, Andreia, Moreira, Diana, Barbosa, Fernando·2018·Research in Developmental Disabilities

Abstract

This review aims to analyze the relationships between Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD), and Conduct Disorder (CD), particularly regarding the relative importance of genetic and environmental factors in the development of these disorders. Studies that examined at least two of these disorders were obtained from multiple databases, following the procedures of the Cochrane Collaboration initiative. Of the 279 documents obtained, nine were retained for in-depth analysis and were considered eligible for inclusion. In addition, eight studies from the manual search were included. The objectives, methodological aspects (sample and instruments), and the main conclusions were extracted from each study. Overall, the results suggest that (a) the causes for the onset and maintenance of these disorders are more associated with genetic factors than environmental factors, although the importance of the latter is recognized, and (b) children with ADHD have a predisposition to manifest behaviors that are common to ODD and CD, including the antisocial behavior that these children often display.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This systematic review synthesized 17 studies (nine from databases plus eight from manual search) on ADHD, ODD, and CD, concluding that their onset, maintenance, and covariation are more strongly associated with genetic than environmental factors, though environmental influences are recognized. Children with ADHD appear predisposed to behaviors common to ODD and CD, including antisocial behavior.

Key findings

Overall, the review concludes that causes for onset and maintenance of ADHD, ODD, and CD are more associated with genetic than environmental factors, although environmental importance is recognized; children with ADHD have a predisposition to manifest behaviors common to ODD and CD, including antisocial behavior. The paper also cites comorbidity estimates of approximately 60% for ADHD with ODD and 16–20% for ADHD with CD.

  • For CD–ODD, Knopik et al. reported a genetic correlation of 0.52 (95% CI 0.18–1.00), meaning genetic influences in CD represent 27% of genetic variation in ODD; shared environmental correlation was 0.28 and nonshared environmental correlation 0.03. In ADHD samples, heritability was 0.33 for CD and 0.64 for ODD (Knopik et al.). Kerekes et al. reported genetic effects representing 50–62% of variance in behavioral problems, except CD-like problems in females (26%).
  • Covariation among ADHD, ODD, and CD was mostly attributed to genetic influences and, to a lesser extent (19%), to nonshared environment effects, with no significant shared environmental effects. Kerekes et al. found 37% of variance attributed to common genetic influences for ADHD and ODD and 21% for ADHD and CD in boys; for girls, 13% and 7%, respectively. Martin et al. reported CD shared heritability of 37% with ADHD-HI and 35% with ADHD-I, and ODD shared heritability of 42% with ADHD-HI.
  • Environmental factors influencing CD and ODD included maternal depression, family disturbances/social disadvantage/atypical family structures, high crime rates, and parental drug/alcohol problems; inadequate supervision was more strongly associated with CD than ODD in both sexes, severe discipline was specifically associated with CD in boys but both disorders in girls, and overprotective parenting was associated with CD only in girls. Burt et al. argued the covariance among ADHD, CD, and ODD comes from a single common environmental factor (estimated covariance 1.0 between each pair), while Zeeuw et al. found common environmental effects on ODD behavior and dominant genetic effects on ADHD behavior.

Methods

Systematic review following Cochrane Collaboration guidelines; two independent reviewers selected studies and extracted data; agreement was almost perfect (Cohen’s K = 0.936, p < 0.001).

  • Searches in EBSCOhost databases (Education Source, MEDLINE with Full Text, PsycInfo, Academic Search Complete, PsycArticles) plus manual search; keywords combined ADHD/hyperactivity terms with antisocial/ODD/CD terms and gene* AND environ*; no geographic, temporal, or linguistic constraints. Studies published 1985–2017.
  • From 279 identified studies, 172 duplicates excluded, 107 abstracts evaluated, nine included from databases and eight from manual search (17 total). Inclusion required empirical studies relating at least two of ADHD, CD, ODD; excluded single-disorder studies, studies relating these disorders to other conditions, reviews, theoretical essays, and case studies. Twin methodology was used in 70.5% of retained studies.

Limitations

Paper-stated: risk of reporting bias because only studies published in identifiable sources were included, despite no geographic/linguistic constraints.

  • Paper-stated: inherent limitation related to type of selection and context of sample; majority refer to clinical samples.
  • Evident from text: most studies fall within population genetics, with few molecular genetics data to identify specific genes involved in each condition; the authors also note the review is limited and suggest meta-analytic approaches may be feasible in the future.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.12.010

Cites

61 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 2 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

39 of 94 cited sources checked · 19 supported · 3 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 4

    There are no significant data on shared environmental effects for the covariation between ADHD, ODD, and CD.

    “with no signi fi cant data on shared environmental e ff ects”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Dick et al., 2005 source
    • cites Nadder et al., 2002 source
    • cites Tuvblad et al., 2009 source

      The Results (Bivariate Model Fitting Results) report a significant shared-environmental correlation between ODD and CD symptoms (rc=.81, p<.05). The Discussion also says shared environmental influences contributed modestly to covariation among the symptoms. Thus the paper does not support a categorical claim of no significant shared-environmental effects. (LLM, conf=0.91)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 4

    CD is related to deficits in behavior inhibition.

    “and to de fi cits in behavior inhibition”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Luman et al., 2009 source

      In Discussion Experiment 1 (page unavailable), the paper reports that CD was more related to attention-allocation problems, whereas ADHD was more related to inhibition problems. Its own experiment found inhibition problems in the ADHD-only group, not the ADHD+ODD group. This runs contrary to attributing behavioral-inhibition deficits to CD. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 4

    Early onset of comorbidity between ADHD and ODD or CD represents a risk factor for the appearance of late ADHD symptoms, such as anger and irritability in young people.

    “the early onset of a comorbidity between ADHD and ODD or CD represents a risk factor for the appearance of late ADHD symptoms, such as anger and irritability in young people”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Harvey et al., 2016 source

      The Discussion (Correlated Risk Factors Model; page unavailable) identifies family histories of ADHD and ODD/CD—not early comorbidity itself—as correlated risk factors that independently predict ADHD and anger/irritability, respectively. The paper also classifies anger/irritability as an ODD symptom, not a late ADHD symptom, and reports that ADHD symptoms predicted later argumentative/defiant symptoms. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 4

    ADHD-related hyperactivity in males and inattention in females were covariables for CD problems.

    “Both ADHD-related hyperactivity in male and inattention in female were covariables for CD problems”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kerekes et al., 2014 source
  • Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 4

    Poor verbal ability is not a significant risk factor for CD after controlling for ADHD.

    “poor verbal ability is not a signi fi cant risk factor for CD after controlling for ADHD”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Smith et al., 2011 source
  • May combine two claims. 50
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 14
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A. Azeredo et al. · p. 2

    Low activity of the MAOA gene, significantly associated with ADHD in 65% of studies, increases children's sensitivity to adverse environments and amplifies the risk of conduct disorders.

    “low activity of the monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) gene, which was found to be signi fi cantly associated with ADHD in 65% of the studies, seems to increase the children ' s sensitivity to adverse environments, amplifying the risk of conduct disorders”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ouellet-Morin et al., 2016 source

      The Discussion and the section on interactions between violence and MAOA report that MAOA variants moderated antisocial outcomes, including conduct disorder symptoms, in young males exposed to higher levels of violence. The paper also describes earlier findings concerning a low-activity MAOA allele and childhood maltreatment. It does not report that low MAOA activity was associated with ADHD in 65% of studies, and its own results concern low-frequency alleles rather than establishing their activity level. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 3

    All genetic influences between CD and ODD may be shared, while environmental effects seem specific for each disorder.

    “all genetic in fl uences may be shared, while environmental e ff ects seem to be speci fi c for each disorder”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Knopik et al., 2014 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 3

    Genetic effects represent 50-62% of the variance of behavioral problems, except for CD-like problems in females, which are 26%.

    “genetic e ff ects represent 50 -62% of the variance of behavioral problems, with the exception of problems similar to CD in female (26%)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kerekes et al., 2014 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § A. Azeredo et al. · p. 2

    SLC6A4 genotypes may moderate environmental effects on conduct disorders in children and teenagers with ADHD.

    “Previous research also suggests that SLC6A4 genotypes may moderate the environmental e ff ects on conduct disorders in children and teenagers with ADHD”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sonuga-Barke et al., 2009 source

      The Conduct problems section reports that serotonin-transporter (5HTT/SLC6A4) genotype significantly moderated the association between positive maternal expressed emotion and conduct-problem scores. However, the study measured conduct problems rather than effects on diagnosed conduct disorder, and its sample was limited to boys with ADHD aged 5–17 (Participants; Measures). (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 3

    Early expression of ODD may be more influenced by genetic factors, whereas later expression in childhood or adolescence may be more influenced by environmental causes.

    “the early expression of ODD may be more in fl uenced by genetic factors, whereas later expression of ODD in childhood or adolescence may be more in fl uenced by environmental causes”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Harvey, Breaux, & Lugo-Candelas, 2016 source
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation
    § A. Azeredo et al. · p. 2

    Specific alleles of DRD4 and SNAP25 were significantly associated with ADHD in more than 70% of studies, whereas DRD5 and SLC6A3 were slightly above 60%, and SLC6A4 and HTR1B were less consistent.

    “speci fi c alleles of the DRD4 and SNAP25 genes were found to be signi fi cantly associated with ADHD in more than 70% of the studies, whereas the percentage of signi fi cant associations for DRD5 and SLC6A3 is slightly above 60%”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zhang et al., 2011 source

      The Introduction says DRD4 and SLC6A3 have been implicated in ADHD, while also describing study results as inconsistent. The paper’s core-data section explains how it classifies significant associations, but our copy gives no study percentages for DRD4, SNAP25, DRD5, or SLC6A3, and does not establish the claimed comparison. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A. Azeredo et al. · p. 2

    Differential susceptibility theory postulates that children differ in their susceptibility to environmental experiences or qualities, with some more susceptible to both negative and positive conditions.

    “the di ff erential susceptibility theory, postulates that children di ff er in their susceptibility to experiences or qualities of the environment”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Belsky, 1997, 2005

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Ellis & Boyce, 2011 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § A. Azeredo et al. · p. 2

    Individuals carrying specific variants in plasticity genes are more susceptible to environmental factors, regardless of whether those factors are risk-promoting or development-enhancing.

    “Individuals carrying speci fi c variants in these genes are more susceptible to environmental factors, regardless of their risk-promoting or development-enhancing nature”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Belsky et al., 2009 source

      The Abstract and Conclusion describe certain gene variants as potentially making individuals more responsive to both adverse and supportive environments. The source presents this as a suggested interpretation of the evidence, however, whereas the claim states it as an established fact. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Ellis & Boyce, 2011 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A B S T R A C T · p. 1

    ADHD has a genetic basis that implicates several neuropsychological factors causing attentional changes, impulsivity, and motor agitation in the child.

    “The ADHD has a genetic basis, which implicates several neuropsychological factors that cause attentional changes, impulsivity, and motor agitation in the child”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Cardo & Servera-Barceló, 2005
    • cites Jin, Du, Zhong, & David, 2014 source

      The Introduction describes reduced attention span and overactivity, and the Discussion mentions inattention and impulsivity. The Discussion only suggests that ADHD may be related to neurobiological abnormalities; it does not establish the claimed causal chain from a genetic basis through neuropsychological factors to those symptoms. In the Results, ADHD family history was not significantly associated with prevalence. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 3

    Shared environmental correlation between CD and ODD is 0.28, and nonshared environmental correlation is 0.03.

    “Shared environmental correlations obtained a result of 0.28, and nonshared environmental correlations yielded a result of 0.03”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Knopik et al., 2014 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 3

    The genetic correlation between CD and ODD is 0.52 (95% CI 0.18-1.00), meaning genetic influences in CD represent 27% of the genetic variation in ODD.

    “the genetic correlation between the disorders is 0.52 (IC 95% = 0.18 -1.00), which means that genetic in fl uences in CD represent 27% of the genetic variation in ODD”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Knopik et al., 2014 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 4

    In boys, 37% of variance is attributed to common genetic influences for both ADHD and ODD and 21% to common problems between ADHD and CD; in girls, the corresponding numbers are 13% and 7%.

    “with 37% of the variance attributed to common genetic in fl uences for both ADHD and ODD and 21% to the common problems between ADHD and CD, in boys. For girls, the corresponding numbers are 13% and 7%, respectively”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kerekes et al., 2014 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 4

    Common environmental effects had some influence on ODD behavior, while dominant genetic effects had an influence on ADHD behavior.

    “Common environmental e ff ects had some in fl uence on ODD behavior, while dominant genetic e ff ects had an in fl uence on ADHD behavior”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zeeuw et al., 2015 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 4

    In a sample of 476 children with ODD and 159 children with CD, the prevalence of both disorders was higher in males than females (3.5% vs 2.1% for ODD, and 1.3% vs 0.6% for CD).

    “in a sample of 476 children with ODD and 159 children with CD, the prevalence of both disorders was higher in male than in boys than in girs (3.5% compared to 2.1% for ODD, and 1.3% compared to 0.6% for CD, respectively)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kerekes et al., 2014 source

      The Results (‘Prevalence, age at onset, and overlap’) give the stated counts and boy–girl percentages. However, the 476 and 159 children scored above cut-offs for ODD-like and CD-like problems; the paper does not identify them as children diagnosed with ODD or CD. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 4

    In ADHD samples, heritability for CD was 0.33 and for ODD was 0.64.

    “In ADHD samples, hereditability for CD was 0.33 and for ODD was 0.64”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Knopik et al., 2014 source

      The Results (Genetic analyses) report heritability estimates of 0.33 for CD and 0.64 for ODD once ADHD is controlled for. The paper does not describe these as estimates from an ADHD sample; its Current Study section describes a sample of female twins. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 4

    Symptoms originating from ADHD disrupt family functioning and consequently contribute to the development of ODD symptoms.

    “the symptoms originating from ADHD disrupt family functioning and, consequently, contribute to the development of ODD symptoms”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Harvey et al., 2016 source

      The ‘Theoretical Models of Comorbidity Between ADHD and ODD’ section describes the proposed pathway: ADHD symptoms may disrupt family functioning and thereby place children at risk for ODD. But it presents this as a theory, not an established causal finding. The ‘Developmental Precursors Model’ discussion says the causal mechanisms still need to be identified. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 4

    Children with ADHD and ODD also exhibit poor motor control, but their inhibition remains intact, suggesting inhibition is more related to ADHD than to ODD.

    “Although children with ADHD and ODD also exhibit poor motor control, their inhibition remains intact, which suggests that this function is more related to ADHD than to ODD”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Luman et al., 2009 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 4

    There is covariance between verbal ability and CD of approximately 16%, but it is associated with influences shared with ADHD.

    “there is a covariance with CD (approximately 16%), but it is associated with in fl uences shared with ADHD”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Smith et al., 2011 source

      The Discussion says that covariance between verbal ability and CD is significant and that most of it is associated with influences also shared with ADHD. But its approximately 16% figure refers to the variance of CD attributable to influences common to all three traits, not to the magnitude of the covariance between verbal ability and CD. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 4

    Common environmental factors have greater influence on ODD behavior, whereas genetic effects have influence on ADHD behavior.

    “the common environmental factors have greater in fl uence on ODD behavior, whereas genetic e ff ects have in fl uence on ADHD behavior”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zeeuw, van Beijsterveldt, Lubke, Glasner, & Boomsma, 2015 source

      The Discussion reports some common environmental influence on ODD behavior and dominant genetic influence on ADHD behavior. But it also says heritability is substantial for both; the Results describe common environmental effects on ODD as negligible at most ages in boys and present to some extent in girls. The source therefore does not support an unqualified claim that common environmental factors have greater influence on ODD behavior. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 4

    Children with only ADHD exhibit inhibition problems, which along with poor motor response may explain part of the behavioral symptoms of impulse control.

    “Children with only ADHD exhibit inhibition problems, which along with poor motor response may explain part of the behavioral symptoms of impulse control”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Luman et al., 2009 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3. Discussion · p. 5

    Environmental influences are specific to each disorder and seem more pronounced in typical behavior of ODD than of ADHD, where genetic influences seem greater.

    “certain studies (e.g., Knopik et al., 2014) argue that they are speci fi c to each disorder, and seem to be more pronounced in typical behavior of ODD than of ADHD, where genetic in fl uences seem to be greater”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Knopik et al., 2014 source

      The Results (Genetic analyses; page unavailable) suggest that shared environmental effects are specific to ODD and CD. The paper does not establish that environmental influences are more pronounced in ODD than in ADHD, or that genetic influences are greater in ADHD; its ADHD-adjusted estimates compare ODD with CD. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Zeeuw et al., 2015 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 3. Discussion · p. 5

    There is a strong relationship between CD and ODD, which seem to share genetic influences, specifically a unique genetic influence that increases the tendency for externalization in both disorders and most likely in ADHD, although each disorder may also have its own genetic characteristics.

    “There is a strong relationship between CD and ODD (Rowe et al., 2002), which seem to share genetic in fl uences (Knopik et al., 2014), speci fi cally an unique genetic in fl uence that increases the tendency for externalization in both disorders (Dick et al., 2005) and, most likely, in ADHD, although each disorder may also have its own genetic characteristics”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Rowe et al., 2002 source
    • cites Knopik et al., 2014 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Dick et al., 2005 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3. Discussion · p. 5

    Heritability of ODD and ADHD behavior is lower among twins who do not share a classroom, suggesting some behavioral differences are attributable to differences in classroom environments.

    “hereditability of ODD and ADHD behavior is lower among twins who do not share a classroom, which suggests that some of the behavioral di ff erences are attributable to the di ff erences in classroom environments”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zeeuw et al., 2015 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § A B S T R A C T · p. 1

    Overall, the causes for the onset and maintenance of ADHD, ODD, and CD are more associated with genetic factors than environmental factors, although the importance of environmental factors is recognized.

    “Overall, the results suggest that (a) the causes for the onset and maintenance of these disorders are more associated with genetic factors than environmental factors, although the importance of the latter is recognized”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 3. Discussion · p. 5

    Most studies fall within population genetics, and there are few molecular genetics data that allow knowing the specific genes involved in each of these conditions.

    “The most of the studies fall within the scope of population genetics and, therefore, there are few molecular genetics data that allow us to know the speci fi c genes involved in each of these conditions”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 3. Discussion · p. 7

    Children with ADHD presented social maladjustment at school and an inability to interact with other children.

    “Children with ADHD presented social maladjustment at school, have an inability to interact with other children;”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 3. Discussion · p. 7

    Both ODD and CD are strongly associated with ADHD.

    “Both ODD and CD are strongly associated with ADHD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 3. Discussion · p. 5

    ADHD, CD, and ODD seem influenced at a genetic level, increasing the tendency for externalization, as well as at an environmental level, as the manifestation of symptoms varies according to context and education.

    “these disorders seem to be in fl uenced at a genetic level, increasing the tendency for externalization in both disorders, as well as at an environmental level, as the manifestation of the symptoms of the disorders vary according to the context in which the children are inserted and the way they are educated”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 3. Discussion · p. 7

    High rates of maternal depression, family problems, parental alcohol or drug problems, and crime are specific environmental factors influencing both CD and ODD.

    “High rates of maternal depression, family problems, parental alcohol or drug problems, and crime, are speci fi c environmental factors in fl uencing both CD and ODD.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 3. Discussion · p. 7

    There is a genetic covariation between CD and ODD of 0.52, with specific shared environmental effects contributing to the individual differences of each disorder.

    “There is a genetic covariation between CD and ODD of 0.52, with speci fi c shared environmental e ff ects that contribute to the individual di ff erences of each disorder.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Burt et al.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 3

    Although CD and ODD share genetic responsibility, each disorder may possess a unique genetic influence.

    “although there is a shared genetic responsibility, each disorder may possess a unique genetic in fl uence”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dick et al., 2005 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 3

    CD and ODD are related in their behavioral manifestations, and children with CD often exhibit some ODD behavior, suggesting a shared developmental relationship.

    “CD and ODD are related in their behavioral manifestations. Children with a diagnosis of CD often exhibit some ODD behavior, thus suggesting they may share a developmental relationship”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rowe, Maughan, Pickles, Costello, & Angold, 2002 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A. Azeredo et al. · p. 2

    The etiology of ADHD is complex, with both genetic and environmental factors implicated in the disorder.

    “The etiology of ADHD is complex, with both genetic and environmental factors implicated in the disorder”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Biederman & Faraone, 2005 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 3

    The correlation between genetic factors of CD and ODD is .58, but there is no overlap of these factors.

    “reported a higher correlation between the genetic factors of CD and ODD (.58), but not an overlap of these factors”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dick, Viken, Kaprio, Pulkkinen, & Rose, 2005 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A. Azeredo et al. · p. 2

    ADHD, ODD, and CD are polygenic and some genes may have pleiotropic influences in different traits of these disorders.

    “The ADHD, ODD, and CD are polygenic and some genes may have pleiotropic in fl uences in di ff erent traits of these disorders”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 3

    Some genes may represent a general risk factor increasing the risk of all externalization disorders, while others contribute to specific symptoms of individual disorders.

    “Some genes may represent a potential general risk factor (e.g., temperament, personality, behavioral disinhibition), which increase the risk of all externalization disorders, while others may contribute to speci fi c symptoms of individual disorders”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dick et al., 2005 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A. Azeredo et al. · p. 2

    ADHD has an estimated comorbidity rate of 16-20% with CD, and this comorbidity is more common in boys than in girls.

    “ADHD has an estimated comorbidity rate of 16 -20% with CD, although evidence indicates that this comorbidity is more common in boys than in girls”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Biederman et al., 2002 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § 1.1. Search strategy · p. 3

    The index of agreement in the study selection process was almost perfect, with Cohen's Kappa = 0.936, p < 0.001.

    “The index of agreement in the study selection process was evaluated by Cohen ' s Kappa and revealed almost perfect agreement, K =0.936, p &lt; 0.001”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Landis & Koch, 1977 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A B S T R A C T · p. 1

    In children with ADHD, oppositional behavior is the most frequent additional difficulty and the most responsible for the child's difficulty in regulating emotions.

    “it is common to fi nd, in children with ADHD, other challenges and di ffi culties, with oppositional behavior being the most frequent and most responsible for the child ' s di ffi culty in regulating emotions”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Barkley et al., 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation
    § 1.1. Search strategy · p. 2

    Study selection for eligibility and data extraction were conducted by two independent reviewers to reduce the likelihood of missing studies and to minimize classification errors.

    “the selection of the studies for eligibility and data extraction was conducted by two independent reviewers, in order to reduce the likelihood of missing any study and to minimize classi fi cation errors”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Higgins & Green, 2011

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A. Azeredo et al. · p. 2

    ADHD has high comorbidity with several disorders, but none greater than with ODD, with comorbidity rates estimated at approximately 60%.

    “The ADHD has high rates of comorbidity with several disorders, but none greater than with ODD, with comorbidity rates estimated to be approximately 60%”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites APA, 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Maughan, Rowe, Messer, Goodman, & Meltzer, 2004 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 4

    Irrespective of the disorders exhibited by children, the mean age for their appearance is around 4-5 years.

    “Irrespective of the disorders exhibited by children, the mean age for their appearance is around 4 -5 years”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rowe et al., 2002 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 4

    Children with only ADHD exhibit social maladjustment in school, experience rejection by peers, and manifest bullying.

    “children with only ADHD exhibit social maladjustment in school, experience rejection by peers and manifest bullying”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tseng et al., 2011 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 4

    Severe discipline is specifically associated with CD in boys, but associated with both disorders in girls.

    “severe discipline was speci fi cally associated with CD in boys, but associated with both disorders in girls”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rowe et al., 2002 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 4

    The covariance between ADHD, CD, and ODD seems to come from a single common environmental factor.

    “the covariance between ADHD, CD, and ODD seems to come from a single common environmental factor”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Burt, Krueger, McGue, & Iacono, 2001 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 4

    Environmental factors influencing children with CD and ODD are related to maternal depression, family disturbances (social disadvantage and atypical family structures), high crime rates, and parental drug and alcohol problems, which were higher in families of children with CD and ODD.

    “environmental factors which in fl uenced children with CD and ODD disorders were related to: (1) maternal depression; (2) familiar disturbs, represented in terms of social disadvantage and atypical family structures; (3) high crime rates and (4) parental drug and alcohol problems, which were higher in the families of the children who exhibited CD and ODD”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rowe et al., 2002 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 4

    In one study, 96 boys and 70 girls presented ODD criteria, and 132 boys and 47 girls presented CD criteria.

    “96 boys and 70 girls presented ODD criteria, and 132 boys and 47 girls presented CD criteria”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rowe et al., 2002 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 4

    Excessively invasive and overprotective parenting is associated with CD only in girls and has no association with diagnostic status in boys.

    “Excessively invasive and overprotective parenting was associated with CD only in girls, and had no association with diagnostic status in boys”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rowe et al., 2002 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 4

    In males, the prevalence of ADHD is higher, at a ratio of approximately 2:1 compared to females.

    “In male, the prevalence of ADHD is higher, at a ratio of approximately 2:1 when compared to female”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Martin et al., 2006 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 4

    Children with only ODD are impaired in the family domain and have negative family relationships, especially with siblings, due to defiant behavior, suggesting ODD is associated with family dysfunction.

    “Children with only ODD are impaired in the family domain, and have negative family relationships, especially with their siblings, due to their de fi ant behavior, as opposed to children with ADHD, suggesting that ODD is associated with family dysfunction”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tseng et al., 2011 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 4

    ADHD, CD, and ODD have mostly a genetic covariation, even if they can also be influenced by the environment.

    “these three disorders have mostly a genetic covariation, even if they can also be in fl uenced by the environment”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Burt et al., 2001 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 4

    At younger ages, comorbidity between ADHD and ODD or CD is noticeable and seems to share a behavioral dimension originating in a common genetic mechanism.

    “at younger ages, the comorbidity between ADHD and ODD or CD is noticeable, and it seems to share a behavioral dimension, originating in a common genetic mechanism”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Silberg et al., 1996 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 4

    An estimated covariance of 1.0 between each pair of ADHD, CD, and ODD indicates that the same shared environmental factor influences the development of each disorder.

    “An estimated covariance of 1.0 between each pair of disorders indicates that the same-shared environmental factor in fl uences the development of each disorder”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Burt et al., 2001 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2. Results · p. 5

    CD is strongly associated with the impulsive form of ADHD (ADHD-HI), but exhibits a weaker relationship with the inattentive form (ADHD-I), with shared genetic heritability of 37% and 35%, respectively.

    “CD is strongly associated with the impulsive form of the attention de fi cit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD-HI), but exhibits a weaker relationship with the inattentive form (ADHD-I), with shared genetic hereditability being 37% and 35%, respectively”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Martin et al., 2006 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3. Discussion · p. 5

    Children with ADHD display social maladjustment in several areas, which predisposes them to ODD behavior towards relatives or conduct disorders towards peers.

    “children with ADHD display social maladjustment in several areas (e.g., school, peers, siblings, parents), which predisposes them to ODD behavior towards their relatives or conduct disorders towards their peers”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tseng et al., 2011 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3. Discussion · p. 5

    Environmental factors that influence CD and ODD are parental alcohol and drug problems, previous history of parental crime, maternal depression, and family disorders.

    “Environmental factors that in fl uence CD and ODD are parental alcohol and drug problems, previous history of parental crime, maternal depression, and family disorders”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rowe et al., 2002 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3. Discussion · p. 5

    In ODD, the most affected domain is the family environment, but defiant behavior may explain why ODD is more strongly associated with family dysfunction.

    “literature suggests that in ODD the most a ff ected domain is the family environment, but in this fi nding one must take into account the de fi ant behavior, which is typical of this disorder and may explain the fact that ODD is more strongly associated with family dysfunction”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tseng et al., 2011 source
57 of 57

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Conflicting descriptions of the source of covariance

    Major

    The paragraph says covariance among ADHD, CD, and ODD seems to arise from a single common environmental factor, then says the three disorders have mostly genetic covariation. Both statements describe the predominant source of covariance but give different sources.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Azeredo, A., Moreira, D., & Barbosa, F.
Affiliations
  • Instituto Superior da Maia (PT)
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
Corresponding author
Moreira, Diana
Venue
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
82
Pages
10-19
ISSN
0891-4222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2790983869
Cited by
75
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Developmental Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, genetic risk factors, environmental risk factors, antisocial behavior, comorbidities, child and adolescent psychiatric disorders
MeSH terms
Humans, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Risk Factors, Causality, Age of Onset, Disease Management, Neurodevelopmental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-14.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-14.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review