The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhancing infant attachment security: An examination of treatment efficacy and differential susceptibility
Abstract
This randomized controlled trial examined (a) the efficacy of a brief intervention designed to increase the rate of secure infant attachment, (b) the differential susceptibility hypothesis, and (c) whether maternal attachment styles moderated the expected Treatment × Irritability interaction in predicting infant attachment outcomes. Although there was no main effect of treatment, a significant Treatment × Irritability interaction revealed intervention effects for the highly irritable infants only, thus supporting one of two predictions of the differential susceptibility hypothesis: highly irritable infants would have disproportionately better outcomes than moderately irritable infants in better conditions (i.e., with intervention). When separate analyses were conducted with maternal attachment styles, we found significant three-way interactions among treatment, irritability, and each of the examined maternal attachment style dimensions (i.e., secure–fearful and dismissing–preoccupied). Specifically, with more secure mothers, beneficial effects of intervention emerged for highly irritable infants. For more dismissing mothers, the results revealed support for both predictions of the differential susceptibility hypothesis: highly irritable infants, compared to moderately irritable infants, were both more likely to be secure with intervention and less likely to be secure when in the control group. It is interesting that, for more preoccupied mothers, a treatment effect emerged only for moderately irritable infants. We discuss the implications of these findings for the differential susceptibility hypothesis as well as for early intervention.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model.
Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.61.2.226 · Cited by 8,384
Beyond diathesis stress: differential susceptibility to environmental influences
Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0017376 · Cited by 3,039
BOYCE, W. T., & ELLIS, B. J. (2005) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579405050145 · Cited by 2,078
Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (2000) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.4.2.132 · Cited by 1,601 · cited 2×
“Individuals high on attachment anxiety have low thresholds for detecting such cues, making worries about rejection and abandonment particularly salient (Fraley & Shaver, 2000).”
BackgroundDifferential susceptibility to the environment: an evolutionary--neurodevelopmental theory
Ellis, B. J., Boyce, W. T., Belsky, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2011) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579410000611 · Cited by 1,564
ELLIS, B. J., ESSEX, M. J., & BOYCE, W. T. (2005) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579405050157 · Cited by 383
Van Zeijl, J., Mesman, J., Van IJzendoorn, M. H., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Juffer, F., Stolk, M. N., Koot, H. M., & Alink, L. R. A. (2006) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.74.6.994 · Cited by 346
van den Boom, D. C. (1994) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1131511 · Cited by 341
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network (2006) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.38 · Cited by 180
BLAIR, C. (2002) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579402002079 · Cited by 150
Cited by
Differential susceptibility to the environment: an evolutionary--neurodevelopmental theory
Ellis, B. J., Boyce, W. T., Belsky, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2011) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579410000611 · Cited by 1,564
ADHD and emotion dysregulation among children and adolescents
Bunford, N., Evans, S. W., & Wymbs, F. (2015) · Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10567-015-0187-5 · Cited by 306
Incorporating Recognition and Management of Perinatal Depression Into Pediatric Practice
Rafferty, J., Mattson, G., Earls, M. F., Yogman, M. W., COMMITTEE ON PSYCHOSOCIAL ASPECTS OF CHILD AND FAMILY HEALTH, Gambon, T. B., Lavin, A., & Wissow, L. S. (2019) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2018-3260 · Cited by 265
Kim, S., & Kochanska, G. (2012) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01778.x · Cited by 262
Prenatal programming of postnatal plasticity?
Pluess, M., & Belsky, J. (2011) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579410000623 · Cited by 235
Metadata
- Authors
- Cassidy, J., Woodhouse, S. S., Sherman, L. J., Stupica, B., & Lejuez, C. W.
- Venue
- Development and Psychopathology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2011-01-24
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 131-148
- ISSN
- 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-2198
- OpenAlex
- W2127500000
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 12.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhancing infant attachment security: An examination of treatment efficacy and differential susceptibility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0954579410000696
- The paper
- Cassidy, J., Woodhouse, S. S., Sherman, L. J., Stupica, B., & Lejuez, C. W. (2011). Enhancing infant attachment security: An examination of treatment efficacy and differential susceptibility. Development and Psychopathology. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579410000696
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
