The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving parenting, child attachment, and externalizing behaviors: Meta-analysis of the first 25 randomized controlled trials on the effects of Video-feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline
Open accessAbstract
Improving parenting, child attachment, and externalizing behaviors: Meta-analysis of the first 25 randomized controlled trials on the effects of Video-feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline (VIPP-SD). VIPP-SD combines support of parental sensitive responsiveness with coaching parents in sensitive limit setting. Here, we present meta-analyses of 25 RCTs conducted with more than 2,000 parents and caregivers. Parents or children had various risks. We examined its effectiveness in promoting parental cognitions and behavior regarding sensitive parenting and limit setting, in promoting secure child–parent attachment, and reducing externalizing child behavior. Web of Science, MEDLINE, PubMed, and recent reviews were searched for relevant trials (until May 10, 2021). Multilevel meta-analysis with META, METAFOR, and DMETAR in R took account of the 3-level structure of the datasets (studies, participants, measures). The meta-analyses showed substantial combined effect sizes for parenting behavior ( r = .18) and attitudes ( r = .16), and for child attachment security ( r = .23), but not for child externalizing behavior ( r = .07). In the subset of studies examining effects on both parenting and attachment, the association between effect sizes for parenting and for attachment amounted to r = .48. We consider the way in which VIPP-SD uses video-feedback an active intervention component. Whether VIPP-SD indeed stimulates secure attachment through enhanced positive parenting remains an outstanding question for further experimental study and individual participant data meta-analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“and VIPP-SD, which in Van Ijzendoorn et al. [88]’s recent systematic review had a combined effect size of r = 0.18, which the authors state was comparable to d = 0.37.”
From Optimizing parenting and child outcomes following parent–child interaction therapy – toddler: a randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [88]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611417632 · Cited by 6,567
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/466029a · Cited by 3,441
Evaluating Effect Size in Psychological Research: Sense and Nonsense
Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2019) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245919847202 · Cited by 3,295 · cited 1×
“Thus, it is critical to weight the effect size of d = 0 .37 found in the current meta-analysis for VIPP-SD effects on parenting against similar interventions in similar domains instead of using abstract yardsticks (see also Funder & Ozer, 2019).”
The p Factor: One General Psychopathology Factor in the Structure of Psychiatric Disorders?
Caspi, A., Houts, R. M., Belsky, D. W., Goldman-Mellor, S. J., Harrington, H., Israel, S., Meier, M. H., Ramrakha, S., Shalev, I., Poulton, R., et al. (2014) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702613497473 · Cited by 2,449
Less is more: meta-analyses of sensitivity and attachment interventions in early childhood
Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Juffer, F. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.2.195 · Cited by 1,883
Self-citationDoing Meta-Analysis with R: A Hands-On Guide
Harrer, M., Cuijpers, P., Furukawa, T. A., & Ebert, D. D. (2021) · doi:10.1201/9781003107347 · Cited by 1,850
Differential susceptibility to the environment: an evolutionary--neurodevelopmental theory
Ellis, B. J., Boyce, W. T., Belsky, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2011) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579410000611 · Cited by 1,564
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Bakermans-Kranenburg, 2021, Attachment. The fundamental questions, 299
- Stevens, 2020, Virtual VIPP protocol. Virtual delivery of video-feedback intervention to promote positive parenting (VIPP)
- Michalopoulos, 2019, Impacts on family outcomes of evidence-based early childhood home visiting: Results from the mother and infant home visiting program evaluation
- Moss, 2018, Handbook of attachment-based interventions
- Cohen, 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
- Webster-Stratton, 2015, Family-based prevention programs for children and adolescents, 54
- Van IJzendoorn, 1994, Reconstructing the mind: Replicability in research on human development, 57
- Waters, 2021, Measuring attachment developmental assessment across the Lifespan
- Sama-Miller, 2020, Home visiting evidence of effectiveness (HomeVEE) systematic review
- Borenstein, 2019, Common mistakes in meta-analysis and how to avoid them
- Barlow, 2016, Pilot RCT of the use of Video Interaction Guidance with preterm babies., Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 0264, 1469
- Patterson, 1982, Coercive family process: A social learning approach
- Van IJzendoorn, 2005, Enhancing early attachment: Theory, research, intervention, and policy, 297
- Steele, 2018, Handbook of attachment-based interventions
- Forgatch, 2010, Evidence-Based Psychotherapies for Children and Adolescents
- Bakermans-Kranenburg, 2019, Handbook of infant mental health, 527
- Ainsworth, 1974, The integration of a child into a social world, 99
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Learning Theory Approach to Attachment Theory: Exploring Clinical Applications
Bosmans, G., Vlierberghe, L. V., Bakermans‐Kranenburg, M. J., Kobak, R., Hermans, D., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2022) · Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10567-021-00377-x · Cited by 66
Self-citationA meta-analysis on observed paternal and maternal sensitivity
Deneault, A., Cabrera, N., & Bureau, J. (2022) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13832 · Cited by 46
Deneault, A., Duschinsky, R., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Roisman, G. I., Ly, A., Fearon, P. R. M., & Madigan, S. L. (2023) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2023.101093 · Cited by 38
Petsolari, M., Ibrahim, S. B., & Slovak, P. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642619 · Cited by 35
Li, M., Lan, R., Peng, M., & Gong, H. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1183546 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- van IJzendoorn, M. H., Schuengel, C., Wang, Q., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
- Capital Normal University (CN)
- Leiden University (NL)
- Venue
- Development and Psychopathology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2022-01-17
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 241-256
- ISSN
- 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-2198
- OpenAlex
- W4205847149
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11
- FWCI
- 3.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Development and Psychopathology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- ZonMw (641001103, 024.001.003)
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (024‐001‐003)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Therapy and Development
- Keywords
- video feedback, parenting support, parental sensitivity, limit setting, externalizing problems, parental responsiveness, parenting attitudes, child behavior problems
- MeSH terms
- Feedback, Humans, Parent-Child Relations, Video Recording, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Parenting, Feedback, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
