Cited by 97EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningEnglish Language Learning and TeachingOnline and Blended Learning

Institutional and individual dimensions of transatlantic group work in network-based language teaching

BELZ, JULIE A.·2001·ReCALL

Abstract

Network-based language teaching (NBLT) involves the application of global or local communication networks within foreign and second language education (Warschauer and Kern, 2000). In telecollaboration, a type of NBLT, distally located language learners use internet communication tools to support dialogue, debate, collaborative research and social interaction for the purposes of language development and cultural awareness (e.g. Kinginger et al., 1999). To date, the research on NBLT has been limited, focusing primarily on pedagogical implementations of technology and linguistic features of online communication. In particular, researchers have not robustly explored social and institutional dimensions of telecollaboration (Chapelle, 2000:217) nor have they adequately investigated the pervasive assumption that telecollaborative interaction will necessarily and unproblematically afford language learning (e.g. Kramsch and Thorne, to appear). Drawing on social realism (Layder, 1993), a sociological theory which emphasizes the inter-relationship between structure, i.e. society and institution, and agency, i.e. situated activity and psycho-biography, in researching and explaining social action, I present a sociocultural account of German-American telecollaboration. In particular, I explore the meanings that the macro features of (1) language valuation (Hilgendorf, 1996); (2) membership in electronic discourse communities (Gee, 1999); and (3) culturally determined classroom scripts (Hatch, 1992) may have for the differential functionality of virtual group work in this partnership. Differences in group functionality are reflected at the micro-interactional level in terms of (1) frequency and length of correspondence; (2) patterns of discursive behavior such as question-answer pairs; and (3) opportunities for assisted L2 performance and negotiation of meaning. Ethnographic data (e.g. interviews, electronic and classroom discourse, surveys and participant observations) on individual psycho-biographies are interwoven with macro-level descriptions and statistics to paint a rich picture of learner behavior in intercultural telecollaboration. This project is funded by a United States Department of Education International Research and Studies Program Grant (CFDA No.: 84.017A). The author is a research associate for the German component.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0958344001000726a

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most recent studies on telecollaboration explore the kinds of cultural contact afforded by a technological medium.

    “The most recent studies on telecollaboration (Belz, 2001(Belz, , 2002(Belz, , 2003;;Belz & Muller-Hartmann, 2003;Belz & Thorne, 2006;Chase, Macfadyen, Reeder & Roche, 2002;Kramsch & Thorne, 2002;O'Dowd, 2003O'Dowd, , 2005;;Schneider & von der Emde, 2006;Thorne, 2003Thorne, , 2006;;Ware, 2005) explore the kinds of cultural contact afforded by a technological medium.”
  • Special attention in recent studies is paid to tensions and misunderstandings that might hinder intercultural learning.

    “Special attention in recent studies is paid to tensions and misunderstandings that might hinder intercultural learning (Belz, 2001(Belz, , 2002(Belz, , 2003;;Kramsch & Thorne, 2002;O'Dowd, 2003O'Dowd, , 2005;;Thorne, 2003;Ware, 2005).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BELZ, J. A.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
BELZ, JULIE A.
Venue
ReCALL
Published
2001-11
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
213-231
ISSN
  • 0958-3440 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-0109
OpenAlex
W1992866977
Cited by
97
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
44.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ReCALL (publishedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
virtual exchange, virtual group work, language valuation, intercultural communication, social realism, structure and agency, negotiation of meaning, question-answer interaction, online language learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review