Cited by 274Online and Blended LearningEnglish Language Learning and TeachingTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

Learning to teach online or learning to become an online teacher: an exploration of teachers’ experiences in a blended learning course

Comas-Quinn, Anna·2011·ReCALL

Abstract

A key role in the successful implementation of any learning approach is played by teachers, so how well blended learning works will depend largely on how well teachers make the transition from their traditional face-to-face classroom roles to the wider more complex role that blended learning requires. The additional skills and the forging of a new professional identity might not come easily to all practitioners. This paper evaluates the impact that the introduction of blended learning in a distance language learning course has had on teachers. It presents and discusses findings from a small-scale evaluation study which compared quantitative and qualitative data gathered through a survey and a small number of interviews with participant observations from the researcher and the institutional end-of-course debriefing report. The paper argues that whilst technological challenges and the sheer amount of change that teachers were faced with were largely responsible for some of the negative attitudes reflected in teachers’ opinions about the course, a less obvious, broader explanation for the difficulties that teachers encountered might be found in the way that learning, teaching and training are conceptualised by both teachers and the institution. It is proposed that a transmission of knowledge approach to training fails to acknowledge and properly support the transformation of teachers’ identity that results from moving from traditional classroom-based teaching to online teaching. The shift goes beyond the acquisition of ICT skills and requires a pedagogical understanding of the affordances of the new medium and an acceptance by the teacher of his or her new role and identity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0958344011000152

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The literature highlighted the need to not only master the tools, but to understand their pedagogical possibilities to suit their own teaching purposes.

    “Moreover, the literature highlighted the need to not only mastering the tools, but to understand their pedagogical possibilities to suit their own teaching purposes (Comas-Quinn 2011;Cullen, Kullman, and Wild 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Comas-Quinn, A.
Affiliations
The Open University (GB)
Corresponding author
Comas-Quinn, Anna
Venue
ReCALL
Published
2011-09-01
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
218-232
ISSN
  • 0958-3440 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-0109
OpenAlex
W1970233979
Cited by
274
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
32.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ReCALL (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Johns Hopkins University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
blended learning, online learning, teacher identity, teacher professional development, distance language learning, teacher attitudes, ICT skills, pedagogical affordances, transmission of knowledge, teacher role transformation, online teacher training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review