Cited by 319English Language Learning and TeachingForeign Language Teaching MethodsOnline and Blended Learning

Preparing language teachers to teach language online: a look at skills, roles, and responsibilities

Open access
Compton, Lily K.L.·2009·Computer Assisted Language Learning

Abstract

This paper reviews and critiques an existing skills framework for online language teaching. This critique is followed by an alternative framework for online language teaching skills. This paper also uses a systems view to look at the roles and responsibilities of various stakeholders in an online learning system. Four major recommendations are provided to help language teacher training programs prepare future language teachers for online language teaching.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09588220802613831

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Socializing and the formation of trust and friendship is essential for language learning.

    “(c) socializing and the formation of trust and friendship is essential for language learning, and these can be more challenging for the teacher to promote online (Baralt et al., 2016;Compton, 2009;Gleason, 2013;Hampel & Stickler, 2005;Stickler & Shi, 2015);”

    From Task-based language teaching online: A guide for teachers (2017) · cites this paper as Compton, 2009

    In “Types of skills,” Compton says trust and community support interpersonal interaction and that fostering them online requires skills different from face-to-face teaching. But in “Critique of Hampel and Stickler’s skills pyramid,” the paper explicitly says L2 acquisition may not necessarily require online socialisation. It therefore does not support calling socializing essential for language learning; the supplied passages also do not establish that friendship specifically is essential. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Socializing and the formation of trust and friendship can be more challenging for the teacher to promote online.

    “(c) socializing and the formation of trust and friendship is essential for language learning, and these can be more challenging for the teacher to promote online (Baralt et al., 2016;Compton, 2009;Gleason, 2013;Hampel & Stickler, 2005;Stickler & Shi, 2015);”

    From Task-based language teaching online: A guide for teachers (2017) · cites this paper as Compton, 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Abras, C.N., & Sunshine, P.M. (2008). Implementing distance learning: Theories, tools, continuing teacher education, and the changing distance-learning environment. In S. Goertler & P. Winke (Eds.), Opening doors through distance language education: Principles, perspectives, and practices. CALICO Monograph Series (Vol. 7, pp. 175-201). Texas: Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium (CALICO).
  2. Bauer-Ramazani, C. (2006). Training CALL teachers online. In P. Hubbard & M. Levy (Eds.), Teacher education in CALL (pp. 183-202). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  3. Bennett, S., & Marsh, D. (2002). Are we expecting online tutors to run before they can walk? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 29(1), 14-20.
  4. Chapelle, C. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Chapelle, C. (2005). Interactionist SLA theory in CALL research. In J.L. Egbert & G.M. Petrie (Eds.), CALL research perspectives (pp. 53-64). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  6. Chapelle, C.A., & Hegelheimer, V. (2004). The language teacher in the 21st century. In S. Fotos & C.M. Browne (Eds.), New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms (pp. 299-316).
  7. Desjardins, F., & Peters, M. (2007). Single-course approach versus a program approach to develop technological competencies in preservice language teachers. In M.A. Kassen, R.Z. Lavine, K. Murphy-Judy & M. Peters (Eds.), Preparing and developing technology-proficient L2 teachers. CALICO Monograph Series (Vol. 6, pp. 3-22). Texas: Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium (CALICO).
  8. Easton, S. (2003). Clarifying the instructor's role in online distance learning. Communication Education, 52(2), 87-105.
  9. Egbert, J. (2006). Learning in context: situating language teacher learning in CALL. In P. Hubbard & M. Levy (Eds.), Teacher education in CALL (pp. 166-181). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  10. Felix, U. (2003a). An orchestrated vision of language learning online. In U. Felix (Ed.), Language learning online: Towards best practice (pp. 7-20). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
  11. Felix, U., (ed.). (2003b). Language learning online: Towards best practice. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
  12. Glew, M. (ed.). (2003). Distance learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 1-164.
  13. Goertler, S. & Winke, P., (Eds.). (2008). Opening doors through distance language education: Principles, perspectives, and practices. CALICO Monograph Series (Vol. 7). Texas: Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium (CALICO).
  14. Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2005). New skills for new classrooms: Training tutors to teach languages online. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(4), 311-326.
  15. Harasim, L., Hiltz, S.R., Teles, L., & Turoff, M. (1997). Learning networks: A field guide to teaching and learning online (3rd edition). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  16. Harms, C., Niederhauser, D., Davis, N., Roblyer, M.D., & Gilbert, S. (2006). Educating educators for virtual schooling: Communicating roles and responsibilities. Electronic Journal of Communication, 16(1&2).
  17. Hauck, M., & Haezewindt, B. (1999). Adding a new perspective to distance (language) learning and teaching -the tutor's perspective. ReCALL, 11(2), 46-54.
  18. Hegelheimer, V. (2006). When the technology course is required. In P. Hubbard & M. Levy (Eds.), Teacher education in CALL (pp. 116-133). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  19. Holmberg, B., Shelley, M., & White, C., (Eds.). (2005). Distance education and languages: Evolution and change. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
  20. Hoven, D. (2006). Designing for distruption: Remodelling a blended course in technology in (language) teacher education. Proceedings of Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 339-349). Sydney, Australia: Sydney University Press.
  21. Hoven, D. (2007). The affordances of technology for student teachers to shape their teacher education experience. In M.A. Kassen, R.Z. Lavine, K. Murphy-Judy & M. Peters (Eds.), Preparing and developing technology-proficient L2 teachers. CALICO Monograph Series (Vol. 6, pp. 133-164). Texas: Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium (CALICO).
  22. Hubbard, P., & Levy, M. (2006). Introductions. In P. Hubbard & M. Levy (Eds.), Teacher education in CALL (pp. ix-xi). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  23. Hubbard, P. (2004). Learner training for effective use of CALL. In S. Fotos & C.M. Browne (Eds.), New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms (pp. 45-68). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  24. Hubbard, P. (2007). Critical Issues: Professional development. In J. Egbert, E. Hanson-Smith & K. Huh (Eds.), CALL environments: Research, practice, and critical issues (2nd ed). (pp. 276-292).
  25. Hubbard, P. (2008). CALL and the future of language teacher education. CALICO Journal, 25(2), 175-188.
  26. Jones, C.M., & Youngs, B.L. (2006). Teacher preparation for online language instruction. In P. Hubbard & M. Levy (Eds.), Teacher education in CALL (pp. 267-282). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  27. Kessler, G. (2005). Computer assisted language learning within masters programs for teachers of English to Speakers of other languages. PhD dissertation. Ohio University. Retrieved on January 16 2008 at http://www.ohiolink.edu/etd/view.cgi?acc_num¼ohiou1125514948.
  28. Kessler, G. (2006). Assessing CALL teacher training: What are we doing and what we could do better? In P. Hubbard & M. Levy (Eds.), Teacher education in CALL (pp. 23-44). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  29. Lai, C., Zhao, Y., & Li, N. (2008). Designing a distance foreign language learning environment. In S. Goertler & P. Winke (Eds.), Opening doors through distance language education: Principles, perspectives, and practices. CALICO Monograph Series (Vol. 7, pp. 85-108). Texas: Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium (CALICO).
  30. Lee, L. (2004). Learners' perspectives on networked collaborative interaction with native speakers of Spanish in the US. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), 83-100. Retrieved November 10, 2006 from http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num1/lee/default.html.
  31. Lyddon, P.A., & Sydorenko, T. (2008). Assessing distance language learning. In S. Goertler & P. Winke (Eds.), Opening doors through distance language education: Principles, perspectives, and practices. CALICO Monograph Series (Vol. 7, pp. 109-128). Texas: Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium (CALICO).
  32. Mark, M. (1990). The differentiation of institutional structures and effectiveness in distance education programs. In M.G. Moore (ed.), Contemporary issues in American distance education. London: Pergamon.
  33. McLoughlin, C., & Oliver, R. (1999). Pedagogic roles and dynamics in telematics environments. In M. Selinger & J. Pearson (Eds.), Telematics in education: Trends and issues (pp. 32-50). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
  34. O'Dowd, R., & Ritter, M. (2006). Understanding and working with 'failed communication' in telecollaborative exchanges. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 623-642.
  35. Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (2003). The virtual student: A profile and guide to working with Online Learners. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
  36. Peters, M. (2006). Developing computer competencies for pre-service language teachers: Is one course enough? In P. Hubbard & M. Levy (Eds.), Teacher education in CALL (pp. 153-166). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  37. Radic, N. (2000). Parliamo italiano: A computer-mediated course of Italian for beginners delivered at a distance. OTIS e-workshop, 8-12 May 2000. Retrieved March 28, 2008 from http:// otis.scotcit.ac.uk/casestudy/radic.doc.
  38. Radic, N. (2001). Classroom vs. virtual language learning environment. AAIS 2001 Conference University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
  39. Salmon, G. (2003). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online (2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
  40. In P. Hubbard & M. Levy (Eds.), Teacher education in CALL (pp. 80-97). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  41. Stickler, U., & Hauck, M. (2006a). What does it take to teach online? Towards a pedagogy for online language teaching and learning. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 463-475.
  42. Stickler, U. & Hauck, M., (eds.). (2006b). What does it take to teach online? Toward a pedagogy for online language teaching and learning. [Special issue]. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 463-734.
  43. Warschauer, M. (2002). A developmental perspective on technology in language education. TESOL Quarterly, 26(3), 453-475.
  44. White, C. (2003). Language learning in distance education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  45. Wood, C. (2005). Highschool.com. Edutopia, 1(4), 32-37.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Compton, L. K. L.
Affiliations
Iowa State University (US)
Corresponding author
Compton, Lily K.L.
Venue
Computer Assisted Language Learning
Published
2009-02
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
73-99
ISSN
  • 0958-8221 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-3210
OpenAlex
W1970474305
Cited by
319
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
FWCI
22.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Computer Assisted Language Learning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Education › Foreign Language Teaching Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
online language teaching, language teacher education, teacher roles and responsibilities, online learning platforms, teacher preparation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review