The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Innovative assessment of aviation English in a virtual world: Windows into cognitive and metacognitive strategies
Abstract
Aviation English proficiency is a core competency in the global air traffic controller profession. There is, however, growing concern about the current ineffective paper-based assessment methods and the severe lack of interactive online testing for such a critical profession, one that should be ideally assessed in an authentic task and situation (Alderson, 2010; Douglas, 2013). The tests, which lack validity and authenticity, cannot capture how knowledge of aviation English communication and strategic competence are used through valid means and, therefore, inevitably fail to predict how test takers actually perform in the target language use situations (Douglas, 2000). In the present study, the researcher examines the potential use of verbal report data produced by test takers interacting in a virtual testing environment. The research seeks to answer two specific questions: (a) What types of strategies are used in the virtual aviation English task performance? and (b) How can the assessed strategies be interpreted in relation to test takers’ performance? The analysis of the test takers’ verbal reports from stimulated recalls indicates that various cognitive, metacognitive, and communication strategies were used while performing the Virtual Interactive Tasks for Aviation English Assessment, and that there is a positive relationship between the total number of cognitive and metacognitive strategies adopted and the test scores. The findings suggest that the use of an immersive interface and simulated tasks in a virtual world could provide language learners with more authentic opportunities to perform the target tasks and promote strategic, as well as linguistic, competence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Only one study explored students' learning strategies in an English task using video footage as stimuli in a virtual reality setting (Park, 2018).”
From A systematic review of Stimulated Recall (SR) in educational research from 2012 to 2022 (2024) · cites this paper as Park, 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008) · SAGE · doi:10.4135/9781452230153 · Cited by 12,136
Schwienhorst, K. (2002) · Simulation & Gaming · doi:10.1177/1046878102332008 · Cited by 157
Research works printed but not linked: 45
- 10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.020 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0265532209347196 · doi:10.1177/0265532209347196
- 10.1017/S0267190509090138 · doi:10.1017/s0267190509090138
- 10.1007/s11423-012-9259-0 · DOI
- Sadler, 2012, Virtual worlds: An overview and pedagogical examination, Bellaterra Journal of Teaching and Learning Language and Literature, 5, 1, 10.5565/rev/jtl3.456 · doi:10.5565/rev/jtl3.456
- Purpura, 1999, Learner strategy use and performance on language tests: A structural equation modeling approach
- 10.1017/S0958344011000279 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2104/aral0927 · doi:10.2104/aral0927
- Paltridge, 2015, Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource
- Alderson, 1995, Language test construction and evaluation
- 10.1017/CBO9780511667299.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.protcy.2014.02.004 · doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2014.02.004
- 10.1080/15391523.2010.10782553 · DOI
- Khalsa, 2007, CALL environments: Research, practice, and critical, 19
- 10.1177/026553220101800204 · doi:10.1177/026553220101800204
- Swier, 2014, Tasks for easily modifiable virtual environments, The JALT CALL Journal, 10, 203, 10.29140/jaltcall.v10n3.176 · DOI
- Chapelle, 1998, Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research, 32
- 10.1111/0023-8333.51997005 · DOI · Paper page
- Creswell, 2007, Designing and conducting mixed methods research
- Bachman, 1996, Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests
- Bachman, 2010, Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world
- Sadler, 2011, Virtual Worlds for language learning: From theory to practice
- Douglas, 2013, The handbook of English for specific purposes, 367
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.046 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0958344016000185 · DOI
- 10.14742/ajet.283 · DOI
- 10.21236/ADA596660 · doi:10.21236/ada596660
- 10.2307/3586733 · DOI · Paper page
- Can, 2015, The use of 3D virtual learning environments in training foreign language pre-service teachers, Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16, 114
- Holliday, 2007, CALL environments: Research, practice, and critical issues, 163
- Douglas, 2000, Assessing languages for specific purposes
- 10.1017/S0958344012000274 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00948.x · DOI
- Chapelle, 2005, CALL research perspectives, 53
- 10.1017/CBO9780511486999 · DOI · Paper page
- Abdallah, 2015, Virtual task-based situated language-learning with Second Life: Developing EFL pragmatic writing and technological self-efficacy. Arab World English, Journal, 2, 150
- Cushing, 1994, Fatal words: Communication clashes and aircraft crashes
- Lai, 2011, Metacognition: A literature review: Research report
- Messick, 1989, Educational measurement, 13
- 10.1177/1469787415616730 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/026553228500200105 · doi:10.1177/026553228500200105
- 10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.2p.27 · doi:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.2p.27
- 10.1111/j.0883-2919.2004.00368.x · DOI
- Zokić, 2012, Say again, International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 6, 363
Cited by
Huang, H., Hwang, G.-J., & Jong, M. S.-Y. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104593 · Cited by 57
A systematic review of Stimulated Recall (SR) in educational research from 2012 to 2022
Zhai, X., Chu, X., Wang, M., Tsai, C.-C., Liang, J.-C., & Spector, J. M. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-02987-6 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, M.
- Venue
- ReCALL
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2018-01-24
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 196-213
- ISSN
- 0958-3440
- 1474-0109
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Innovative assessment of aviation English in a virtual world: Windows into cognitive and metacognitive strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0958344017000362
- The paper
- Park, M. (2018). Innovative assessment of aviation English in a virtual world: Windows into cognitive and metacognitive strategies. ReCALL. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0958344017000362
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.