Cited by 5Avian ecology and behaviorWildlife Ecology and ConservationWildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses

Population size and habitat of the White-breasted Guineafowl Agelastes meleagrides in the Taï region, Côte d'Ivoire

Open access
WALTERT, MATTHIAS, SEIFERT, CHARLOTTE, RADL, GERHARD, HOPPE-DOMINIK, BERND·2010·Bird Conservation International

Abstract

Summary: The White-breasted Guineafowl Agelastes meleagrides is one of 15 bird species endemic to the Upper Guinea Forests of West Africa. The Taï region in southwestern Côte d'Ivoire probably holds one of the largest remaining populations of this species. We assessed population density in two different sectors in the southern part of Taï National Park and one sector in the N'Zo Faunal Reserve, north of the National Park. The sectors differ in rainfall patterns and hence vegetation type, as well as in previous and past levels of logging and hunting. Line transect surveys were undertaken between 2000 and 2001 with an overall survey effort of 2,883 km. Abundance was highest in the sector with the driest forest type, the N'Zo Faunal Reserve (encounter rate: 0.02 detections km−1, density: 32.9 ind. km−2), where we also observed the largest group recorded for the species so far (38 individuals). The species was almost absent in the southeast of Taï National Park (encounter rate: <0.002 detections km−1), where the impact of poaching on wildlife is strongest. The study confirms that the species reaches highest densities in drier forests and only occurs in smaller numbers in the wetter south of the Taï region. Our data also suggest that past disturbance from logging does not constitute an obstacle for its persistence. The population size in Taï National Park and N'Zo Faunal Reserve should be between 42,000 and 120,000 individuals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0959270909990189

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Spatial variation in pygmy hippo density within Taï NP cannot solely be attributed to anthropogenic stressors.

    “Bogui et al. (2016) reported substantial spatial variation in the density of droppings and other presence indicators within Taï NP. The authors largely attributed this to the historically stronger anthropogenic disturbance in the eastern half of the park (see also N ' Goran et al., 2013; Waltert et al., 2010), though quantification of poaching, mining and logging indices only explained part of the”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 5

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Allport, G., Ausden, M., Hayman, P. V., Robertson, P. and Wood, P. (1989) The conservation of birds of Gola Forest, Sierra Leone. Cambridge, UK: International Council for Bird Preservation. ICBP Study Report No. 38. Alonso, L. E., Lauginie, F. and Rondeau, G., eds. (2005) A rapid biological assessment of two classified forests in south-western Coˆte d'Ivoire. Washington, DC: Conserva- tion International. RAP Bulletin of Biolog- ical Assessment 34.
  2. BirdLife International (2003) BirdLife's on- line world bird database: the site for bird conservation. Version 2.0. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International [http://www.birdlife. org, accessed 2 May 2008].
  3. BirdLife International (2007) BirdLife's on- line world bird database: the site for bird conservation. Version 2.1. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International [http://www.birdlife. org, accessed 2 May 2008].
  4. Buckland, S. T., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., Laake, J. L., Borchers, D. L. and Thomas, L. (2001) Introduction to distance sampling: estimating abundance of biolog- ical populations. Oxford, UK: Oxford Uni- versity Press.
  5. Collar, N. J. and Stuart, S. N. (1985) Threatened birds of Africa and related islands. ICBP/IUCN Red Data Book, part 1. Third edition. Cambridge, U.K: In- ternational Council for Bird Preservation.
  6. Demey, R. and Rainey, H. J. (2005) A rapid survey of the birds of the Haute Dodo and Cavally Classified Forests. Pp. 84-90 in L. E. Alonso, F. Lauginie and G. Rondeau, eds. A rapid biological assessment of two classified forests in south-western Coˆte d'Ivoire. Washington, DC: Conservation International. RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment 34.
  7. Fishpool, L. C. D. (2001) Co ˆte d'Ivoire. Pp. 219-232 in L. D. C. Fishpool and M. I. Evans, eds. Important bird areas in Africa and associated islands -priority sites for conservation. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International. BirdLife Conservation Series 11.
  8. Koch, V. (1994) Le milieu ethnique et socio- culturel. Pp. 94-111 in E. P. Riezebos, A. P. Vooren and J. L. Guillaumet, eds. Le Parc National de Taı¨, Co ˆte d'Ivoire. Wageningen, the Netherlands: La Fondation Tropenbos.
  9. Plumptre, A., Dranzoa, C. and Owiunji, I. (2001) Bird communities in logged and unlogged African forests: Lessons from Uganda and beyond. Pp. 213-238 in R. A. Fimbel, A. Grajal and J. G. Robinson, eds. The cutting edge: conserving wildlife in logged tropical forests. New York: Colum- bia University Press.
  10. Radl, G. (2000) Le biomonitoring dans le Parc National de Taı ¨. Pp. 122-131 in O. Girardin, I. Kone ´and T. Yao, eds. Etat des recherches en cours dans le Parc National de Taı¨(PNT). Abidjan, Co ˆte d'Ivoire: Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques.
  11. van Rompaey, R. S. A. R. (1993) Forest gradients in West Africa -a spatial analy- sis. Doctoral thesis. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Agricultural University.
  12. van Rompaey, R. S. A. R. (1994) Climat. Pp. 42-50 in E. P. Riezebos, A. P. Vooren and J. L. Guillaumet, eds. Le Parc National de Taı¨, Co ˆte d'Ivoire. Wageningen, The Netherlands: La Fondation Tropenbos.
  13. Urban, E. K., Fry, C. H. and Keith, S. (1986) The birds of Africa. Volume II, Gamebirds to pigeons. London: Academic Press.

Authors
WALTERT, M., SEIFERT, C., RADL, G., & HOPPE-DOMINIK, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Göttingen (DE)
  • Laboratoire de droit immobilier et notarial privé et public (FR)
Corresponding author
WALTERT, MATTHIAS
Venue
Bird Conservation International
Published
2009-10-16
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
74-83
ISSN
  • 0959-2709 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-0001
OpenAlex
W2069674932
Cited by
5
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bird Conservation International (publishedVersion)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • GRO (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Volkswagen Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
Keywords
population density, habitat use, precipitation gradient, dry forest, Upper Guinea Forest, Taï National Park, logging disturbance, poaching, endemic birds, population size estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review