Cited by 420Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyLanguage and cultural evolutionArchaeology and Rock Art Studies

Mode 3 Technologies and the Evolution of Modern Humans

Foley, Robert, Lahr, Marta Mirazón·1997·Cambridge Archaeological Journal

Abstract

The origins and evolution of modern humans has been the dominant interest in palaeoanthropology for the last decade, and much archaeological interpretation has been structured around the various issues associated with whether humans have a recent African origin or a more ancient one. While the archaeological record has been used to support or refute various aspects of the theories, and to provide a behavioural framework for different biological models, there has been little attempt to employ the evidence of stone tool technology to unravel phylogenetic relationships. Here we examine the evidence that the evolution of modern humans is integrally related to the development of the Upper Palaeolithic and similar technologies, and conclude that there is only a weak relationship. In contrast there is a strong association between the evolution and spread of modern humans and Grahame Clark's Mode 3 technologies (the Middle Stone Age/Palaeolithic). The implications of this for the evolution of Neanderthals, the multiple pattern of human dispersals, and the nature of cognitive evolution, are considered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0959774300001451

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Florisbad probably represents an archaic part of the H. sapiens clade.

    “While too incomplete for definitive assignment, like the Irhoud material this fossil probably represents an archaic part of the H. sapiens clade.”

    From The origin and evolution of <i>Homo sapiens</i> (2016) · cites this paper as [49]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foley, R., & Lahr, M. M.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Cambridge Archaeological Journal
Published
1997-04
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
3-36
ISSN
  • 0959-7743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-0540
OpenAlex
W2134429388
Cited by
420
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 14
FWCI
54.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge Archaeological Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
Keywords
modern human evolution, Upper Palaeolithic, Middle Stone Age, lithic technology, human dispersal, Neanderthals, cognitive evolution, African origin of modern humans, phylogenetic relationships, Grahame Clark

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review