Rethinking ‘Cattle Cults’ in Early Egypt: Towards a Prehistoric Perspective on the Narmer Palette
Abstract
The Narmer Palette occupies a key position in our understanding of the transition from Predynastic to Dynastic culture in Egypt. Previous interpretations have focused largely upon correspondences between its decorative content and later conventions of élite display. Here, the decoration of the palette is instead related to its form and functional attributes and their derivation from the Neolithic cultures of the Nile Valley, which are contrasted with those of southwest Asia and Europe. It is argued that the widespread adoption of a pastoral lifestyle during the fifth millennium BC was associated with new modes of bodily display and ritual, into which cattle and other animals were incorporated. These constituted an archive of cultural forms and practices which the makers of the Narmer Palette, and other Protodynastic monuments, drew from and transformed. Taking cattle as a focus, the article begins with a consideration of interpretative problems relating to animal art and ritual in archaeology, and stresses the value of perspectives derived from the anthropology of pastoral societies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Access to the raw materials, production, and probably also the specialized contexts of use of graywacke cosmetic palettes and pear-shaped maceheads was restricted in Naqada III by aspiring leaders.
“but access to their raw materials, their production, and probably also the specialized contexts of their use was restricted in Naqada III by aspiring leaders”
From The Egyptian Predynastic and State Formation (2016) · cites this paper as Wengrow 2001
Aspiring leaders commissioned larger-scale ceremonial versions, such as the Hierakonpolis maceheads or the Narmer Palette, to materialize ideologies of kingship.
“who commissioned larger-scale, ceremonial versions, such as the Hierakonpolis maceheads (Fig. 3b) or the Narmer Palette, to materialize ideologies of kingship (Baines 2003, p. 36;Stevenson 2007;Wengrow 2001).”
From The Egyptian Predynastic and State Formation (2016) · cites this paper as Wengrow 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Egyptian Predynastic and State Formation
Stevenson, A. (2016) · Journal of Archaeological Research · doi:10.1007/s10814-016-9094-7 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“3b) or the Narmer Palette, to materialize ideologies of kingship (Baines 2003, p. 36; Stevenson 2007; Wengrow 2001).”
Background
- Authors
- Wengrow, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Wengrow, David
- ORCID
- Wengrow, David
- Venue
- Cambridge Archaeological Journal
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-104
- ISSN
- 0959-7743 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-0540
- OpenAlex
- W2171230682
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge Archaeological Journal (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Oxford
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
- Keywords
- Narmer Palette, Predynastic Egypt, Protodynastic Egypt, pastoralism, animal art, ritual, animal symbolism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review